<html><body><div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>Hello Amrit,<br><br>The following are the related tasks performed today for the Solenoid temperature sensors readouts:<br><br>1. Problem: PT-100 temperature sensors that were connected to the magnet had not proper readings.<br> Solution: Resistance and Temperature in the lookup tables for the PT100 sensors were swapped in the Sol-LV -cRIO program. Problem fixed, actual readouts for PT-100 sensors are ~300 K except for sensor:<br> TS27: TP86127RS_DS_B_BL_M - Resistance measured = 91 ohms ~ 250 K.<br><br>2. Problem : Read-backs for Cernox temperature sensors connected were out of range. (~ 160 K and 330 K)<br> Solution: Found that serial numbers for 10 Cernox sensor used in the 'Master Instrumentation spreadsheet' (reference spreadsheet used for programming Low Voltage cRIO) were different with regards to the serial numbers assigned for the same sensors in the ETI<br> Wiring diagrams. Serial numbers for those cernox sensors were changed in Sol-LV-cRIO program to match with the ETI serial numbers. It seems to be fixed the problem. Readout sensors at this time (~300 K). Except for sensors:<br> TS23: TR86123RS_US_T_BL_C - Resistance measured = 0 ohm - temperature default = 330 K (dead sensor).<br> TS16: TR86116SP_C1_C3 - Resistance measured = 0 ohm - temperature default = 330 K (dead sensor).<br> TS21: TR86121SP_C2_C4 - Resistance measured = 66 ohm - temp = 251 K.<br><br>Resistance for all PT-100 and cernox sensors were measured and verified. The readout of the resistances match with the resistance values measured in ETI (06/13/17) prior to the shipment of the magnet to Jlab.<br><br>Best Regards,<br>Pablo<br><br></div><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"><div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><b>From: </b>"Amrit Yegneswaran" <yeg@jlab.org><br><b>To: </b>"dsg-hallb magnets" <dsg-hallb_magnets@jlab.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, June 30, 2017 4:25:01 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] Solenoid PT Temp Signals on LV Chassis #1<br></div><div><br></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__"><div style="font-family: tahoma,new york,times,serif; font-size: 14pt; color: #009900"><div>great work brian and pablo!<br></div><div> pablo/brian <span id="transmark" style="display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px;"></span>send a report of all the things you guys have done today.<br></div><div>nice weekend to all.<br></div><br><div><span style="display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px;"><br></span></div><br><br><hr id="zwchr"><div><b>From: </b>"Brian Eng" <beng@jlab.org><br><b>To: </b>"dsg-hallb magnets" <dsg-hallb_magnets@jlab.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, June 30, 2017 3:24:47 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] Solenoid PT Temp Signals on LV Chassis #1<br></div><br><div>Attached is another updated Excel file, this time with the correct Cernox serial numbers.<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br>> From: "Brian Eng" <beng@jlab.org><br>> To: "dsg-hallb magnets" <dsg-hallb_magnets@jlab.org><br>> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 4:30:02 PM<br>> Subject: [Dsg-hallb_magnets] Solenoid PT Temp Signals on LV Chassis #1<br><br>> Pablo/Tyler,<br>> <br>> Could one of you move this spreadsheet to the appropriate place on the M drive?<br>> I incremented the version number and date in the file name, hopefully that's<br>> what you guys were doing?<br>> <br>> Rama found some of the addresses were off by one because the B channel isn't<br>> being used, which is where the 1.6 K values were coming from.<br>> <br>> Thanks<br>_______________________________________________<br>Dsg-hallb_magnets mailing list<br>Dsg-hallb_magnets@jlab.org<br>https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallb_magnets<br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Dsg-hallb_magnets mailing list<br>Dsg-hallb_magnets@jlab.org<br>https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallb_magnets<br></div></div></body></html>