<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Dario,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">as you know we are working on a very limited budget thus I think it is unnecessary to spend additional money for something not mandatory.</div><div class="">I have already signed the PRs for the while color and I would like to stay with that.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">patrizia<br class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">---------------------------------------------------<br class=""># Patrizia Rossi<br class=""># Jefferson Lab <br class=""># 12000 Jefferson Avenue<br class=""># Suite 5<br class=""># Newport News VA 23606 (USA)<br class=""># e-mail: <a href="mailto:rossi@jlab.org" class="">rossi@jlab.org</a><br class=""># phone: +1 (757) 269 7740<br class=""># fax: + 1 (757) 269 5800</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""># cell: +1 (757) 528 7606<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div>
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 23/ago/2017, at 06:32, Dario Orecchini <<a href="mailto:Dario.Orecchini@lnf.infn.it" class="">Dario.Orecchini@lnf.infn.it</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">Hello,<br class=""><br class="">I and Sandro suggest to use the Yellow RAL 1016. It's a regular Yellow very similar to safety Yellow.<br class="">Regarding the Bob comments the drawings update is on going, however go on with the procurements because<br class="">we are speacking of not fundamental details.<br class=""><br class="">Best regards<br class="">Dario e Sandro<br class=""><br class="">Il 2017-08-23 00:09 Amrit Yegneswaran ha scritto:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Bob,<br class="">Below are the cost changes as it pertains to colors.<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>* Given that the cost increase for painting the parts yellow is $708<br class="">more than having the parts painted in white - 50% the cost of the<br class="">strongback parts,<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>* and given the fact that we are in a terrible budget crunch, i'm<br class="">sure you know this fact, there isn't money available to endorse<br class="">painting the parts in yeloow.<br class="">_So the parts will be painted white_.<br class="">Thank you for your understanding<br class="">amrit<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>White (Current Quote)<br class="">White (Currently quoted)<br class="">Yellow (If Specified on drawings)<br class="">Safety Yellow (If Specified on drawings)<br class="">Load Test Parts<br class="">$1840<br class="">$2020<br class="">$2400<br class="">Trolley<br class="">$2375<br class="">$2550<br class="">$3000<br class="">Strongback parts<br class="">$1490<br class="">$1843<br class="">$2400<br class="">TOTAL COST<br class="">$5705<br class="">$ 6413<br class="">$7800<br class="">-------------------------<br class="">FROM: "Robert Miller" <<a href="mailto:rmiller@jlab.org" class="">rmiller@jlab.org</a>><br class="">TO: "Tyler Lemon" <<a href="mailto:tlemon@jlab.org" class="">tlemon@jlab.org</a>><br class="">CC: "dsg-rich" <<a href="mailto:dsg-rich@jlab.org" class="">dsg-rich@jlab.org</a>><br class="">SENT: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 3:34:40 PM<br class="">SUBJECT: Re: [Dsg-rich] RICH part drawings to check before fabrication<br class="">Hi Tyler,<br class="">You can paint all the parts regular yellow to reduce the cost.<br class="">Regards,<br class="">Bob<br class="">Sent from my iPhone<br class="">On Aug 22, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Tyler Lemon <<a href="mailto:tlemon@jlab.org" class="">tlemon@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Hello Bob,<br class="">In regards to General Comment #1 you made in the attached document,<br class="">we were told by G&R Metals that safety yellow is more expensive<br class="">compared to regular yellow because safety yellow is defined by ANSI<br class="">Z535 standard.<br class="">Marc has contacted G&R for an estimate on how much more the job will<br class="">cost if safety yellow is used. The price difference is in the table<br class="">below.<br class="">White (Current Quote)<br class="">White (Currently quoted)<br class="">Yellow (If Specified on drawings)<br class="">Safety Yellow (If Specified on drawings)<br class="">Load Test Parts<br class="">$1840<br class="">$2020<br class="">$2400<br class="">Trolley<br class="">$2375<br class="">$2550<br class="">$3000<br class="">Strongback parts<br class="">$1490<br class="">$1843<br class="">$2400<br class="">Because of the price difference, could you let us know which parts,<br class="">if any, can be painted with regular yellow or plain white?<br class="">Best regards,<br class="">Tyler<br class="">-------------------------<br class="">FROM: "Bob Miller" <<a href="mailto:rmiller@jlab.org" class="">rmiller@jlab.org</a>><br class="">TO: "Dario Orecchini" <<a href="mailto:dario.orecchini@googlemail.com" class="">dario.orecchini@googlemail.com</a>>, "Tomassini<br class="">Sandro" <<a href="mailto:sandro.tomassini@lnf.infn.it" class="">sandro.tomassini@lnf.infn.it</a>><br class="">CC: "Tyler Lemon" <<a href="mailto:tlemon@jlab.org" class="">tlemon@jlab.org</a>><br class="">SENT: Thursday, August 17, 2017 3:01:28 PM<br class="">SUBJECT: Re: RICH part drawings to check before fabrication<br class="">Hi Dario and Sandro,<br class="">Please see my comments in the attached document for the RICH tooling<br class="">drawings.<br class="">Regards,<br class="">Bob<br class="">On 8/16/2017 3:58 PM, Tyler Lemon wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Hello Bob,<br class="">As we discussed on the phone, attached are the three drawings sets<br class="">for the RICH parts that DSG would like checked by Hall B<br class="">Engineering.<br class="">It would be urgent to check these as soon as possible to avoid any<br class="">delay in the parts' fabrication. We expect that the procurement of<br class="">the fabrication contract will be complete in about one week.<br class="">Best regards,<br class="">Tyler<br class=""></blockquote>--<br class="">Bob Miller<br class="">Hall B Lead Engineer<br class="">Jefferson Lab<br class="">757 269-7867<br class=""></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><RICH Drawing Review.docx><br class=""></blockquote>_______________________________________________<br class="">Dsg-rich mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Dsg-rich@jlab.org" class="">Dsg-rich@jlab.org</a><br class="">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-rich<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Dsg-rich mailing list<br class="">Dsg-rich@jlab.org<br class="">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-rich<br class=""></blockquote>_______________________________________________<br class="">Dsg-rich mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Dsg-rich@jlab.org" class="">Dsg-rich@jlab.org</a><br class="">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-rich<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>