<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Hi Marco,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
It seems that JLab's email security system doesn't like the file types of the scripts you sent.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Could you please resend them either zipped into one file, or just as text files where I can change the extension my self to run them.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Thanks,<br>
</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Marco Mirazita <Marco.Mirazita@lnf.infn.it><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, October 11, 2021 4:33 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Tyler Lemon <tlemon@jlab.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> dsg-hallb_rich@jlab.org <dsg-hallb_rich@jlab.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [dsg-hallb_rich] [EXTERNAL] Re: d0 results for mirrors 5 and 5C</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Attachment type is not allowed. It has been removed and discarded by JLAB ProofPoint (POD). It is NOT recoverable.<br>
<br>
Inform sender to work around this by putting a password on the attachment (i.e encrypt it) with WinZip and send you the password.
<br>
<br>
Encrypted attachments are allowed through the filters.<br>
<br>
======================================================================<br>
Hi Tyler,<br>
here is 4 files to make the plots I showed at the RICH meeting last <br>
friday.<br>
Yuo should copy them in the main directory where you have your data and <br>
run the perl script, for example:<br>
<br>
> ./doAllPlots.pl 5C/2021-10-05/horizontal/no_ambient "" _2ms_corr<br>
<br>
You will get one pdf per each root file and a D0Log.dat.pdf with all the <br>
spots in one page.<br>
Let me know if you have troubles running it.<br>
<br>
Marco<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Il 2021-10-07 18:02 Tyler Lemon ha scritto:<br>
> Hi Marco,<br>
> <br>
> Okay, we'll repeat the tests.<br>
> <br>
> I do have some questions, though.<br>
> <br>
> For the procedure, it says to determine the exposure time by testing<br>
> various exposures until the maximum CCD counts is ~850. This is what<br>
> we did with the latest measurements. If when we repeat the tests with<br>
> 0.5-ms exposure times, and the CCD counts are significantly less than<br>
> 850 for what we determine to be the smallest image size by eye, should<br>
> we still continue the tests?<br>
> <br>
> Also, there is a trim potentiometer on the light source that I'm<br>
> guessing will slightly vary the brightness of the source. Should we<br>
> use that to slightly increase the source brightness if we are at<br>
> significantly lower CCD counts with 0.5-ms exposure?<br>
> <br>
> Lastly (this is mainly just out of curiosity) for the tests, is there<br>
> a reason the light source is red?<br>
> <br>
> Like you said, we can talk about it in the meeting, but I wanted to<br>
> ask the questions now in case the answers need some thinking time.<br>
> <br>
> -Tyler<br>
> <br>
> -------------------------<br>
> <br>
> From: Marco Mirazita <Marco.Mirazita@lnf.infn.it><br>
> Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 11:43 AM<br>
> To: Tyler Lemon <tlemon@jlab.org><br>
> Cc: dsg-hallb_rich@jlab.org <dsg-hallb_rich@jlab.org><br>
> Subject: Re: [dsg-hallb_rich] [EXTERNAL] Re: d0 results for mirrors 5<br>
> and 5C<br>
> <br>
> Hi Tyler,<br>
> in your measurements you used an exposition time variable from 2 to<br>
> 3.5<br>
> ms, at least by reading the name of the files.<br>
> This is definitely bigger than the value of 0.5 ms we used for the<br>
> RICH-1 mirrors.<br>
> I would ask you to repeat the measurement with 0.5 ms exposition time.<br>
> There could be also some issue with the alignment, since the image on<br>
> the CCD seems to be moving with Z.<br>
> We can discuss about this point tomorrow at the meeting.<br>
> I have posted my slides for tomorrow on the RICH wiki if you want to<br>
> have a look now.<br>
> Marco<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> dsg-hallb_rich mailing list<br>
> dsg-hallb_rich@jlab.org<br>
> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallb_rich">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallb_rich</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>