<html><body><div style="font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__"><div style="font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000" data-mce-style="font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div><div style="font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000" data-mce-style="font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><p style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;">Hello,</span></p><p style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;"> </span></p><p style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;">After performing of further debugging/testing over the Ethernet modules 1756-ENBT and 1756-EN2T on the DSG PLC and Standalone PLC test stations, we couldn't find obvious cause that generated the error: "Service Request Error: Invalid mode or State for service request (Code 16#000c) " when the modules were swapped.</span></p><p style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;"> </span></p><p style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;" data-mce-style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;">DSG contacted Rockwell Automation technical support on two occasions:</span></p><ol><li style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in;" data-mce-style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">On 7/05/2018 the Tech Support's conclusion with regards to the communication issues for the Ethernet modules was that neither EN2T nor ENBT module can be used as communication modules in RS-LOGIX 5000 version 16. We did not agreed on this conclusion since we proved in previous test performed on the Standalone PLC with similar conditions and configurations as the SHMS system (Used mixed communication modules ENBT /EN2T and Controlnet modules) that EN2T and ENBT module work without problems.</span></li><ul><li style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.0in;" data-mce-style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.0in;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';"> Today (7/06/2018) it was performed another test on the Standalone PLC using DSG-PLC chassis and the two EN2T and ENBT modules to mimic configuration in SHMS PLC systems; configurations/firmware revisions (ENBT at 4.8 and EN2T at 2.7) for the modules, controller revision and RS-LOGIX version 16 were used for this test. The test run with no problems. After this test we noticed that the only major difference between the Standalone setup and the actual SHMS PLC systems was the redundancy configuration.</span></li></ul><li style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in;" data-mce-style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list .5in;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Today (7/06/2018) after updating/sharing the results of our test performed in the Standalone PLC with Rockwell tech support, they came up with the following conclusion which makes more sense to us:</span></li><ul><li style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.0in;" data-mce-style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.0in;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">1756-ENBT and 1756-EN2T modules can be use with RS-LOGIX5000 v16 as long as redundancy system (extra PLC controller chassis part of the system) is not configured as part of the PLC system.</span></li><li style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.0in;" data-mce-style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.0in;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';"> If redundancy system is running in the PLC systems (which is our case for SHMS) it will be required the following:</span></li><ul><li style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.5in;" data-mce-style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.5in;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Upgrade firmware revision for ENBT module to at least its version 6.01</span></li><li style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.5in;" data-mce-style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.5in;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Upgrade firmware revision for EN2T module to at least its version 4.2. </span></li><li style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.5in;" data-mce-style="color: black; line-height: normal; tab-stops: list 1.5in;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">The upgrades of both firmwares for the two Ethernet modules are not supported by RS-LOGIX5000 version 16. Latest firmware version supports by RS-LOGIX5000 version 16 are 2.7 for EN2T and 4.8 ENBT. </span></li></ul></ul></ol><p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;">We can conclude that: if the two Ethernet modules requires to be implemented in the SHMS Q1 and HX PLC chassis, it will be required upgrade the RS-LOGIX5000 from current version 16 to version 20 which is latest version that the SHMS 1756-L62 PLC controller can support. Also we investigated that RS-LOGIX5000 version 20 is compatible with windows 10.</span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;">If any version newer than 20 is desired, it will be needed different PLC controllers.</span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;"> </span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;"> </span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;">Best Regards,</span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;" data-mce-style="line-height: normal; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;" data-mce-style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'; color: black;">Pablo</span></p><br><br><hr id="zwchr"><div><b>From: </b>"Pablo Campero" <campero@jlab.org><br><b>To: </b>"dsg-hallc controls" <dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, July 3, 2018 5:01:48 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>[Dsg-hallc_controls] Swapping Controlnet modules by Ethernet modules test<br></div><br><div><div style="font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000" data-mce-style="font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>Hello,</div><br><div>This afternoon was performed the swapping of Q1 and HX Controlnet modules by two Ethernet modules (EN2T and ENBT).</div><br><div>Ethernet cables were connected from Ethernet switch to Q1 and HX PLC chassis. After the swapping the following were the findings:</div><br><ol><li>Noticed communication problems with Ethernet module (ENBT) swapped on HX PLC chassis. We were not able to communicate with this (ENTB) module, Net LED indicator showed on its front display of the module was not blinking (under normal operation green light blinks). To solve issue: <div> -Verified proper Ethernet switch ports and connections</div><div>- Ethernet cable swapped by one used for </div>- Verified correct MAC address for the IP assigned on the .165 Hallc Network<div>- Attempt local Ethernet connection to try manual IP setting assignment through DHCP software, did not work.</div><div> </div></li><li>Q1 Ethernet module (EN2T) connected to the network with not problem (able to ping it and showed in RSLINK software), but we found issues in the .ACD PLC file after it was connected and run, status show error connections.</li></ol><br><div>Since time was tight, we could not solve these issues, and Controllnet modules for Q1 and HX PLC chassis were installed back, configurations re-established for controlNet networks. The two Ethernet modules (EN2T and ENBT) were taken to DSG controll room for more testing and debugging.</div><br><br><div>Best Regards,</div><div>Pablo</div><br><br><br><br><div> </div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Dsg-hallc_controls mailing list<br>Dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org<br>https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallc_controls</div></div></div></div><br></div></div></body></html>