The hms dipole is being ramped up now
Would like to see the new probe data
Steven
----- Original Message -----
From: Tyler Lemon <tlemon@jlab.org>
To: Steve Lassiter <lassiter@jlab.org>
Cc: dsg-hallc controls <dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org>
Sent: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 11:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallc_controls] UPS status
Hi Steve,
I won’t be at work this afternoon.
Depending on what needs to be decided, the discussion could happen through the dsg-hallc_controls mailing list or Pablo, Amanda, and Brian could stop by when they are available.
Tyler
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Steve Lassiter <lassiter@jlab.org> wrote:
>
> I am in the hall testing magnets.
> Drop by and lets discuss this.
>
> Steven
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tyler Lemon" <tlemon@jlab.org>
> To: "lassiter" <lassiter@jlab.org>
> Cc: "dsg-hallc controls" <dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 9:45:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallc_controls] UPS status
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> Mindy has fabricated the two cables with 25-pin dsub connectors needed to monitor the HMS and SHMS detector hut UPS units. Today, we plan to run the cables to the appropriate racks in Hall C.
>
> Is there any conflict in us running the cable and magnets ramping?
>
> Also, we still need to know whether we could one of SHMS HX PLC's analog input channels for monitoring the SHMS detector hut UPS. Once this is decided on, we'll change the coded accordingly and place the routines for monitoring the UPS units in M:\dsg-hallc_controls.
>
> Best regards,
> Tyler
>
>
>
> From: "Tyler Lemon" <tlemon@jlab.org>
> To: "Steve Lassiter" <lassiter@jlab.org>
> Cc: "dsg-hallc controls" <dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 11:54:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallc_controls] UPS status
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> We'll plan to still use HMS rotation PLC module 3, channel 13 for one channel. For the second, we'll use HMS rotation PLC module 3, channel 3 since that channel is also open.
>
> For the SHMS, we could either use an available analog input channel or add a digital input module to the HX chassis. Is there a preference in using analog input vs digital input module?
>
> --Tyler
>
>
> From: "Steve Lassiter" <lassiter@jlab.org>
> To: "Tyler Lemon" <tlemon@jlab.org>
> Cc: "dsg-hallc controls" <dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 10:46:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallc_controls] UPS status
>
> Hi Tyler,
>
> I prefer option 1.
>
> Let me know which channels you are thinking of using.
>
> Steven
>
>
> From: "Tyler Lemon" <tlemon@jlab.org>
> To: "Steve Lassiter" <lassiter@jlab.org>
> Cc: "dsg-hallc controls" <dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 9:39:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallc_controls] UPS status
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> If UPS fault signals were chained together as suggested, a cable would need to be run from the counting house UPS to the SHMS PLC inside Hall C to be able to separately monitor the counting house UPS on SHMS PLC.
>
> We will not be able to use an Ethernet tag from the HMS PLC because that UPS status would be a summary that includes the HMS detector hut UPS.
>
> If this cable to the SHMS PLC cannot be ran, we can:
> Option 1.) Use one additional digital input channel to separately monitor each of HMS's UPS units, allowing just the counting house UPS status to be sent to SHMS PLC with the Ethernet tag.
> Option 2.) Use the chained-together "HMS UPS Fault" status that includes both the counting house UPS and the HMS detector hut UPS for the SHMS. This would cause the SHMS PLC to indicate a fault if the HMS detector hut UPS goes bad.
>
> Please let us know which (run cable to SHMS PLC, Option 1, or Option 2) is preferred so we can complete this task this week.
>
> Best regards,
> Tyler
>
>
>
>
> From: "Steve Lassiter" <lassiter@jlab.org>
> To: "Tyler Lemon" <tlemon@jlab.org>
> Cc: "dsg-hallc controls" <dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 4:12:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallc_controls] UPS status
>
> Hi Tyler,
>
> 1. By chaining the two different UPS interlock signals together, for each spectrometer, the number of I/O channels needed is reduced. No need for two tags when only one I/O channel is being used. Debugging and finding faults is not too encumbered by chaining them together as they are only two UPS per spectrometer. Try finding the bad reading of 24 kliks-on temperature switches chain together as a comparison.
>
> 2. Do not know. IF they are not, then they need to be wired and properly documented on a drawing.
>
> 3. It could be either an ethernet tag or a tag in the Kepserver database (right Mike?)
>
> 4. There are 24V psu unit sources in the PLC rack upstairs, and in each I/O rack for each spectrometer. Care must be taken not to use 24V from different sources for the PLC UPS.
>
> Thanks
> Steven
>
>
> From: "Tyler Lemon" <tlemon@jlab.org>
> To: "Steve Lassiter" <lassiter@jlab.org>
> Cc: "dsg-hallc controls" <dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 3:33:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dsg-hallc_controls] UPS status
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> I have a few questions/comments on you email.
>
> 1.) Should there be a single tag that encompasses faults on either the PLC UPS (upstairs in counting house) or the I/O UPS (down in hall)?
>
> 2.) Is the wiring to the I/O UPS units in the hall to the appropriate PLC channels complete?
>
> 3.) Since there are no SHMS I/O channels upstairs in the counting house, should the PLC UPS status be read by the HMS PLC and passed to the SHMS PLC as an ethernet tag? If this is not the case, has the cabling between the PLC UPS upstairs and the SHMS I/O channel downstairs been ran?
>
> 4.) A 24 V power supply is needed to generate the signal that indicates a UPS fault for the PLC UPS. Is there one available to install in the rack next to the UPS and dsub-to-terminal-block adapter on the second floor of the counting house?
>
> Best regards,
> Tyler
>
>
>
> From: "Steve Lassiter" <lassiter@jlab.org>
> To: "dsg-hallc controls" <dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 2:02:37 PM
> Subject: [Dsg-hallc_controls] UPS status
>
> Hi,
>
> There are three UPS being used for the HallC control systems that need to watched and acted upon.
>
> HMI I/O UPS
> SHMS I/O UPS
> HMS and SHMS PLC UPS
>
> For the HMS. The status of the I/O UPS was originally planned to be read by the rotation rack I/O chassis, module 3 channel 13. This is still available and one could add the HMS PLC UPS status in series to the HMS I/O UPS status.
>
> Now for the SHMS, a new module, IB16D, should be added to the HX chassis, slot 6 to read the SHMS I/O UPS and SHMS PLC UPS (same UPS as the the HMS but a different relay contact) in series to one another.
>
> Steven
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dsg-hallc_controls mailing list
> Dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallc_controls
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dsg-hallc_controls mailing list
> Dsg-hallc_controls@jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/dsg-hallc_controls