[E16-e1f] SC calibration constants for E1-6

Harut Avakian avakian at jlab.org
Mon Apr 7 05:45:56 EDT 2014


Dear All,
Let us discuss comparison of different cookings this Tuesday at our 
e16-e1f meeting (I just sent the announcement).
Aram also has some comparisons with Misha's cook.
Before choosing which way to go we will certainly need all the software 
and calibration constant sets under control.
Aram and Misha, please update the wiki page with all input files 
(exe,tcl,scripts,runindex links,nt22maker,....) used for cooking. The 
version of user ana should be tagged, so we can recompile it later, if 
we need to change something to avoid situation when we have different 
exes around and in particular used for data and MC.
The farm is currently overloaded with Hall-D challenge and we better 
optimize all efforts on cooking.
Best,
Harut


On 4/7/14, 3:35 AM, garillon at jlab.org wrote:
>> Hi Harut,
>>
>> you probably missed my previous message where I explained that I was
>> struggling with JLab MySQL database (JLab version is somehow
>> incompatible with ours, indeed I couldn't load a dump of my local table).
>> So, as I suggested then to wait until Monday for new cooked files.
>> I remain of the same opinion: I just relaunched test cooking once more.
>> Now everything seems to go right.
>>
>> If it does go as expected, shall I write these files on tape too?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>                 Mikhail.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/28/2014 11:57 AM, Harut Avakian wrote:
>>> On 3/26/14 7:56 PM, osipenko at ge.infn.it wrote:
>>>> Hi Silvia,
>>>>
>>>> better he looks them next week since I had to relaunch these test jobs
>>>> (there was a problem with mysql permissions on my new table). So,
>>>> perhaps, it will take until tomorrow to get cooked files on disk.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Misha,
>>> Seems there are no major changes. My suggestion is to check out the
>>> official trunk version of user ana and put those changes there.
>>> If you send me the list of files you changed, I can do that myself.
>>> Since the testing will be done any way, we can and probably should do
>>> several tests before mass cooking the e16 (also e1f and may be some
>>> others):
>>> 1) trunk user_ana with calib_user.RunIndexe1_6
>>> 2) updated trunk user_ana with calib_user.RunIndexe1_6m
>>> 3) misha's user_ana with calib_user.RunIndexe1_6m
>>>
>>>> probably know already and a few minor debugs. Runindex used is:
>>>> calib_user.RunIndexe1_6m, scripts are simple PBS example which run
>>>> user_ana.
>>>
>>> Once we finalized the configuration for cooking, we should agree on
>>> scripts. We should have 1 official version of ntuples and root22s,
>>> otherwise will spend months on checking and comparing things.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> harut
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/26/2014 04:38 PM, Silvia Niccolai wrote:
>>>>> have a question: are you using the latest "official" user_ana or do
>>>>> you have your own special version? Just to make sure that Brice's
>>>>> cooking of his MCs will be consistent with your data coo
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> Hello Mikhail, Harut
>
> I am very interested in the SC recalibration as it is a critical point in
> my analysis.
> I would like to know where can I find the following:
> -Osipenko's  user_ana with the .tcl file you are running with.
> -Osipenko's JLAB environment.
> - "Official" NT22maker
>
> Also I am applying my own CC Matching cuts at the data analysis stage. Is
> it still possible for me to remove the CC Matching and CC Chi square cuts
> from the RECSIS?
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Brice
>



More information about the E16-e1f mailing list