<div dir="ltr">Dear collaborators,<div><br></div><div>I put in</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.lnf.infn.it/~pisanos/e1f/?play=http://www.lnf.infn.it/~pisanos/e1f/q_h10_h22_e1f.png">http://www.lnf.infn.it/~pisanos/e1f/?play=http://www.lnf.infn.it/~pisanos/e1f/q_h10_h22_e1f.png</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>a plot with the q distribution for the nt10 file - left - and for nt22 - right.</div><div>They have been produced on the very same file in the two cooking samples, namely clas_038458.A13.root.</div><div>
<br></div><div>As you can see, there are no neutral tracks in nt22, while there are in nt10, so it seems that the problem emerges when the nt10 files are converted into the nt22 format. By the way, also the number of entries is very different (and it is also different from the entry number in the corresponding nt10 file of the old cooking).</div>
<div><br></div><div>Did you find out what is going on in the translation from nt10 to nt22, and where we missed all the neutrals?<br clear="all"><div><br></div><div>Let me know if I can help somehow with this check.</div>
<div><br></div><div>As to the helicity checks, I am not able to find online the runs where the delay problem didn't occurr: Harut, could you suggest me where to find this information?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks in advance,</div>
<div><br></div><div>silvia</div><div><br></div><div></div>
</div></div>