[ee] draft slides

[Puneet Khetarpal]

Hi Pawel,

The slides look great. I just have a few minor comments:

- I noticed that the process of interest (gamma p -> gamma* p' ->
e^+e^-p') is indicated in the diagrams. But it may be helpful to write
it out explicitly at some point in at least one of the slides (for
clarity, completeness and the uninitiated).
- On slide 6, "s" is not defined. Is it taken to be the Mandelstam "s"?
- In slide 9, it may be helpful to indicate the reference frame of the
cross section and the angle measurements. By just looking at what's on
the slide, it is not completely obvious.
- On slide 12, the statement "6 GeV data were important for developing
methods". I'm not sure I understand what this statement means. Maybe
specifying what type of methods were important would be useful.
Analysis methods? Experimental methods?
- On slide 15, italicizing "s" and "t" would be nice. Also, in the
figure on the left, the title says "E_{\gamma} > 9 GeV" Is there an
upper limit to the energy? 11 GeV?
- I'm not sure if there will be enough time, but it would be nice to
at least re-iterate and summarize the reasons and importance for the
measurement of these GPDs and J/Psi production at the end of the
presentation.

Just my $0.02,
Puneet

http://about.me/puneetk

"No word is true until it is eaten" - 36 Lessons of Vivec, Sermon 27


On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Pawel Nadel-Turonski <turonski at jlab.org> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I was hoping to circulate a draft of the slides before the presentation
> at the CLAS collaboration meeting this Wednesday, but I only had them
> ready at the last moment. The reason for this was not only that I was
> lazy, but also that the disk in my netbook died. You can find the
> current version of the slides, with only minor changes since Wednesday,
> here:
> https://userweb.jlab.org/~turonski/tcs/proposal/TCS_PAC39_v0.pdf
> One comment during the presentation was to make the importance of the
> J/Psi measurement for the TCS analysis clearer. I am still thinking how
> to do that in a compact way. Please let me know if you have comments or
> suggestions. I hope to have the next version ready this weekend. The PAC
> presentation will be on Tuesday.
>
> Best Regards,
>
>     Pawel
>
> _______________________________________________
> ee mailing list
> ee at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/ee