[ee] TCS proposal -- skeleton for scientific motivation section
Christian Weiss
weiss at jlab.org
Thu Mar 8 21:00:21 EST 2012
Dear Friends,
Vadim and I produced a draft skeleton of the scientific motivation
section of the TCS proposal; see attachment. Please have a look
and send us your comments or suggestions, if any. Best if we
fix the logic and structure at this level; Vadim will then take
the lead in fleshing out the actual text.
The skeleton assumes a top-level organization into two main
sections: "Scientific motivation" and "Proposed experiment."
As we discussed this morning, the 6 GeV results will be discussed
in a subsection of "Scientific motivation," with the aims of
demonstrating the feasibility, bringing out whatever conclusions
can be drawn, and quantifying the improvements expected with 12 GeV
kinematics. The more technical aspects of the 6 GeV experiment
can be discussed in the experimental section.
I hope we can move quickly with the main text.
Cheers,
Ch.
Christian Weiss
Theory Center
Jefferson Lab
12000 Jefferson Ave
Newport News, VA 23606, USA
Phone: +1.757.269.7013
Fax: +1.757.269.7002
E-mail: weiss at jlab.org
-------------- next part --------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I) SCIENTIFIC MOTIVATION
1) INTRODUCTION
Spacelike-timelike correspondence: Basic property of hadronic physics,
rooted in fundamental principles of relativity and causality;
examples are spacelike/timelike FFs and DIS/Drell-Yan
Hard exclusive processes: New class of processes, QCD factorization,
GPDs, combine aspects of elastic FFs and PDFs
DVCS: Well-developed leading-twist formalism, access to GPDs at
amplitude level, promising early data, extensive program
TCS: Cross-channel version of DVCS, QCD factorization and handbag
mechanism, growing interest
Main motivation for TCS:
1) Test universality of GPDs/CFFs implied by factorization;
analog of DIS -- DY correspondence
2) Special sensitivity to real part of CFFs; impacts on GPD models
3) Prospect of global GPD analysis: Amplitude analysis
Dispersion relations, other developments
Feasibility demonstrated by CLAS 6 GeV experiment
2) TIMELIKE VIRTUAL COMPTON SCATTERING AND GPDs
Kinematic range for leading-twist appoximation:
1 GeV^2 < M^2 < M_psi^2, high W, low t
[Figure with e+e- -> hadrons data]
Present/discuss leading-twist expressions
[Figure with handbag diagrams]
GPD integrals/CFFs same as in DVCS
Discuss sensitivity to real part
[Figure with GPD model predictions for Re(CFF)]
Comment on NLO corrections: Timelike expected to be sensitive to NLO;
experience with elastic FFs (Radyushkin & Stefanis); work in progress
[Figure for illustration -- schematic]
Comment on amplitude analysis (Guidal et al.): Status, issues,
prospect of future joint DVCS-TCS analysis
[Figure for illustration -- projected results]
Comment on dispersion analysis: Experimentally accessible information
on GPDs; model-independent analysis (Polyakov & Vanderhaeghen);
importance of data on real part; prospect of future joint DVCS-TCS
analysis
Comment on higher-twist corrections: Phenomenological estimates;
alternative models; duality of GVMD and quark description --
Bjorken scaling through off-diagonal terms
3) TIMELIKE COMPTON SCATTERING RESULTS FROM CLAS 6 GEV
Discussion of data & analysis prospects
Feasibility demonstrated
Limitations of 6 GeV kinematics -- why 12 GeV is needed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
II) PROPOSED EXPERIMENT
[Description of 12 GeV experiment]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the ee
mailing list