[Eg6_analysis] EC_Time
Stepan Stepanyan
stepanya at jlab.org
Sun Nov 7 08:53:41 EST 2010
Thanks Lamiaa and Bayram.
Seems we are done with ec time calibrations.
Stepan
On 11/6/10 5:01 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
> Hi Stepan,
>
> I have processed one file of each 5.7GeV runs to check the T0 time
> correction that
> Bayram applied to the EC timing.
> You can see the result of this test on the "pass0_vec1" table on the
> online monitoring
> web page:
> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg6/cooking/online_sql/monitor.html
> It seems that the correction works very well for the whole run range.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lamiaa
>
> ************************************************************
> * Lamiaa El Fassi email: elfassi at jlab.org
> <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
> * Research Associate @ Rutgers University
> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
> * Newport News, VA. 23606
> ************************************************************
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org
> <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>> wrote:
>
> Lamiaa,
>
> That sounds great, please do so if you have time.
>
> Thanks, Stepan
>
>
> On 11/4/10 11:27 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>> Hi Bayram,
>>
>> I checked couple of EC_CALIB subsystems, it seems you have
>> updated all of them with your new constants.
>>
>> I am thinking to process one file from each 5.7GeV runs to check
>> the effect of this timing change
>> on all of them. How that sound for you?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Lamiaa
>>
>> ************************************************************
>> * Lamiaa El Fassi email: elfassi at jlab.org
>> <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
>> * Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>> * Newport News, VA. 23606
>> ************************************************************
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:13 AM, bayram torayew
>> <bayramtore at gmail.com <mailto:bayramtore at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I wrote new constants to the DB. Can you check whether it is
>> OK or not?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bayram
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi
>> <elfassi at jlab.org <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bayram,
>>
>> I was waiting your reply, so I didn't do it yet.
>>
>> Please go ahead and link you new constants to all 5.7GeV
>> runs [60600-61215].
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> Lamiaa
>>
>> ************************************************************
>> * Lamiaa El Fassi email: elfassi at jlab.org
>> <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
>> * Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>> * Newport News, VA. 23606
>> ************************************************************
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:43 AM, bayram torayew
>> <bayramtore at gmail.com <mailto:bayramtore at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Lamia,
>>
>> If you did not write constants to all 5.7 GeV runs, I
>> can do it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bayram
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi
>> <elfassi at jlab.org <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bayram,
>>
>> As a clarification to the comparison of the first
>> histogram 6600 that you sent in your file.
>> I produced a similar ones but after showing the
>> fit result on them. The attached file
>> "ect61107_pass0v1.eps" and "ect61107_ec4.eps"
>> contains the fit result of histograms 6600
>> (only file 01 of a run 61107) from previous
>> pass0_v1 and yesterday's test. By looking to the
>> second fit parameter "P2" you will notice the
>> effect of the 150ps correction that you did.
>> The P2 is the variable that we store in CSQL
>> database as the mean of the ECt-SCt, and we
>> are monitoring online.
>> As a reference, I grabbed the two table below
>> from the CSQL database. The first table contains
>> some ECt and RF variables from pass0_v1, and the
>> second table contains the same variables
>> after T0 correction. By comparing the meanECt
>> between the two tables, it's clear that the
>> correction works very well.
>>
>> mysql> select time, runno, runext,meanECt,
>> sigmaECt, meanRF, sigmaRF from pass0_v1 where
>> runno=61107;
>>
>> +----------------+-------+--------+-----------+----------+-----------+----------+-----------------------
>> | time | runno | runext |
>> meanECt | sigmaECt | meanRF | sigmaRF |
>> +----------------+-------+--------+-----------+----------+-----------+----------+-----------------------
>> | 20100927123809 | 61107 | 2 | -0.137183 |
>> 0.283532 | 0.000295 | 1.53583 |
>> | 20100927123829 | 61107 | 0 | -0.145314 |
>> 0.273189 | -0.009556 | 0.232634 |
>> | 20100927123836 | 61107 | 1 | -0.140297 |
>> 0.278291 | -715.91 | 262.525 |
>> | 20100927123918 | 61107 | 199 | -0.131658 |
>> 0.279846 | -0.000243 | 6.04733 |
>> | 20100927123921 | 61107 | 7 | -0.146954 |
>> 0.272927 | -0.009928 | 7.66647 |
>> | 20100927124003 | 61107 | 198 | -0.13663 |
>> 0.285362 | -0.000978 | 0.351751 |
>> | 20100927124154 | 61107 | 6 | -0.132169 |
>> 0.281154 | 0.00262 | 1.53238 |
>> | 20100927124216 | 61107 | 5 | -0.136083 |
>> 0.279424 | -0.013988 | 0.323303 |
>> | 20100927125143 | 61107 | 4 | -0.135444 |
>> 0.290308 | -0.099548 | 0.003567 |
>> | 20100927125651 | 61107 | 3 | -0.141135 |
>> 0.286162 | -0.015248 | 6.66342 |
>> +----------------+-------+--------+-----------+----------+-----------+----------+-------------------------
>>
>> mysql> select time, runno, runext,meanECt,
>> sigmaECt, meanRF, sigmaRF from ec_calib where
>> runno=61107 && time>20101102000000 && (runext<=10
>> || runext=198 || runext=199);
>> +----------------+-------+--------+----------+----------+-----------+----------+----------------------
>> | time | runno | runext |
>> meanECt| sigmaECt | meanRF | sigmaRF |
>> +----------------+-------+--------+----------+----------+-----------+----------+-----------------------
>> | 20101103085747 | 61107 | 1 | 0.009278 |
>> 0.278218 | -0.013734 | 0.367396 |
>> | 20101103090524 | 61107 | 2 | 0.01248 |
>> 0.286261 | 0.000757 | 0.166415 |
>> | 20101103091036 | 61107 | 10 | 0.017908 |
>> 0.282665 | -0.019994 | 0.004426 |
>> | 20101103091044 | 61107 | 3 | 0.00888 |
>> 0.286028 | -0.014068 | 18.3328 |
>> | 20101103091106 | 61107 | 198 | 0.012264 |
>> 0.288957 | 0.000254 | 0.341149 |
>> | 20101103091111 | 61107 | 0 | 0.003021 |
>> 0.279989 | -0.002451 | 1.08812 |
>> | 20101103091643 | 61107 | 199 | 0.016746 |
>> 0.283369 | -0.010677 | 0.277356 |
>> | 20101103091803 | 61107 | 6 | 0.016062 |
>> 0.28398 | 0.008187 | 0.310647 |
>> | 20101103091825 | 61107 | 7 | 0.006204 |
>> 0.281322 | -0.005417 | 0.355592 |
>> | 20101103092425 | 61107 | 4 | 0.012366 |
>> 0.300597 | -0.029244 | 20.2786 |
>> | 20101103092430 | 61107 | 5 | 0.013586 |
>> 0.28063 | -0.018597 | 2.75205 |
>> +----------------+-------+--------+----------+----------+-----------+----------+------------------------
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Lamiaa
>>
>> PS: Please let me know if you will link the 61107
>> constants to the whole 5.7 GeV run range
>> [60600-61215]
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************
>> * Lamiaa El Fassi email:
>> elfassi at jlab.org <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
>> * Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>> * Newport News, VA. 23606
>> ************************************************************
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:17 AM, bayram torayew
>> <bayramtore at gmail.com
>> <mailto:bayramtore at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I attached three (6600, 6620, and 6641)
>> histograms to compare new const. with old const.
>>
>> /w/hallb/claseg6/btorayev/ec_time/test_61107/
>> for old constants.
>> /w/hallb/claseg6/btorayev/ec_time/test_61107_new_const/
>> for new constants.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bayram
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Stepan
>> Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org
>> <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes Lamiaa, constants are good for that runs.
>>
>> Stepan
>>
>>
>> On 11/3/10 11:15 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>> Hi Stepan,
>>>
>>> That means we can link the new EC timing
>>> constants of a run 61107 to the whole
>>> 5.7 GeV runs.
>>>
>>> Bayram: Do you want to do that or shall
>>> I do it?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Lamiaa
>>>
>>> ************************************************************
>>> * Lamiaa El Fassi email:
>>> elfassi at jlab.org <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
>>> * Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>>> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757)
>>> 269-5703
>>> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>>> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>>> * Newport News, VA. 23606
>>> ************************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Stepan
>>> Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org
>>> <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I checked few histogram files and
>>> things look quite good.
>>> Electron vertex time offset is ~20
>>> ps (histogram 6600) and
>>> beta for neutrals is at ~1.003
>>> (histogram 6620).
>>> So, corrections worked.
>>>
>>> Stepan
>>>
>>> On 11/3/10 10:16 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Bayram,
>>>>
>>>> I processed 50 files of a run
>>>> 61107. A 90% of these cooked files
>>>> are already done.
>>>> You can access the BOS, ANAHIST and
>>>> the SEB ntuple files respectively
>>>> at the
>>>> subdirectories BOS, anaht and paw
>>>> of the main trunk:
>>>>
>>>> /work/clas/claseg6/top_dir/ec_calib/pass0_ec4/
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Lamiaa
>>>>
>>>> ************************************************************
>>>> * Lamiaa El Fassi
>>>> email: elfassi at jlab.org
>>>> <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
>>>> * Research Associate @ Rutgers
>>>> University
>>>> * Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax:
>>>> (757) 269-5703
>>>> * Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson
>>>> Ave.
>>>> * Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>>>> * Newport News, VA. 23606
>>>> ************************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:29 PM,
>>>> bayram torayew
>>>> <bayramtore at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:bayramtore at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Lamia,
>>>>
>>>> I wrote new constants (150 ps
>>>> is added to To ) to the DB for
>>>> run61107. Could you please cook
>>>> this run?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Bayram
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20101107/46a0e91d/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Eg6_analysis
mailing list