[Eg6_analysis] EG6 Database Update

Stepan Stepanyan stepanya at jlab.org
Tue Oct 19 02:46:32 EDT 2010


  Dear all,

We will not have meeting today.
Sorry for late notification.

Stepan


On 10/18/10 7:49 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
> Hi Stepan,
>
> I have posted the results of the monitoring DC test on the online Eg6 
> secure page under
> a link/table name: pass0_vdc1. You can access it at:
> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/eg6/cooking/online_sql/monitor.html.
>
> Attached file contains a summary of the processed test runs and some 
> info about their
> DC calibration source run and run ranges.
>
> I was willing to link that to the wiki page but since we didn't 
> receive_until now_ any meeting
> notification, I think we won't have a meeting this week! Is that right?
> In case it's true, I am also not able to attend this week's meeting!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lamiaa
>
> ************************************************************
> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org 
> <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
> ************************************************************
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org 
> <mailto:stepanya at jlab.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Lamiaa,
>
>     It seems like a good idea. Can you also link csql to a new db table.
>
>     Thanks, Stepan
>
>
>     On 10/15/10 10:38 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>     Hi Stepan,
>>
>>     I have updated the EG6 database with the new DC constants after
>>     the last iteration done by Seema.
>>     Upon request I have linked the constants of a run 61819 to the
>>     short one-pass run period covering
>>     the range from 61783-61790 since Seema had some difficulties to
>>     calibrate a run 61790.
>>
>>     I am wondering if you may be interested to test couple of runs to
>>     see the behavior of the DC after
>>     the new update. My proposal is to pick five runs from each
>>     subgroup of runs that was calibrated separately. In that case we
>>     can cook a total of 50 runs (~ 500 jobs) to monitor the DC variables.
>>
>>     Please let me know what do you think.
>>
>>     Lamiaa
>>
>>     ************************************************************
>>     *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
>>     <mailto:elfassi at jlab.org>
>>     *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>>     *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>>     *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>>     *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>>     *  Newport News, VA. 23606
>>     ************************************************************
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20101019/41599215/attachment.html 


More information about the Eg6_analysis mailing list