[Eg6_analysis] draft of my DIS presentation

[Stepan Stepanyan]

Hi Hovanes,

It might be difficult to explain, your are right.
But it might not be meaningless either. As I
showed, different different final state channels
are dominant at different Mx2 and asymmetry
will be (can be) different. Of course we need
more statistics to say any thing.

Stepan


On 4/8/11 4:06 PM, Hovanes Egiyan wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> you are right, I did not notice the minus sign. But the plot
> with rapid oscillations beyond statistical fluctuations at high
> Mx is still going to be difficult to explain.
>
> Hovanes.
>
>
>
> On 04/08/2011 03:24 PM, voutier at lpsc.in2p3.fr wrote:
>> Hello Hovannes,
>> I agree the helicity signal plot is not really convincing but I just
>> want to correct your remark that it should be zero. In fact the minus
>> sign between the integrals double the signal since it is of opposite sign
>> in both parts of the phi space. you may have a look at Malek's paper
>> on the neutron dvcs to see a spectra where it is pretty well working
>> So the conclusion there is not enough stat at the moment to be
>> conclusive.
>> Hovanes Egiyan<hovanes.egiyan at gmail.com>   a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Yohann,
>>>
>>> Nice talk, here are a few suggestions:
>>>
>>> o On the title page: change to "On behalf of the CLAS Collaboration".
>>> eg6 is not a collaboration.
>>>       And you can put your affiliation right below your name and above the
>>> "CLAS Collaboration" line.
>>>
>>> o I do not think the plot of "Helicity signal" is worth showing, it seems
>>>       to be deviating from zero too much. If all angles are integrated out
>>> it should be consistent with
>>>      zero to very high (~10^-5) precision. You may have trouble explaining
>>> these fluctuations beyond
>>>      the error bars.
>>>
>>> o Title of the last slide should be "Conclusions" not "Conclusion".
>>>
>>> o The last bullet in "Conclusions":  Change  to  "RTPC calibration is
>>> still being improved". It is
>>>        unclear what you mean by "energy calibrations", and both momentum
>>> and dE/dx calibrations
>>>        are very unlikely to be final.
>>>
>>> Hovanes.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/08/2011 12:12 PM, Yohann Perrin wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> This is a draft of my talk at DIS2011 :
>>>> www.jlab.org/~perrin/DIS2011_draft.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Comments and suggestions are welcome.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Yohann
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Eg6_analysis mailing list
>>>> Eg6_analysis at jlab.org
>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/eg6_analysis
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Eg6_analysis mailing list
>>> Eg6_analysis at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/eg6_analysis
>>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Eg6_analysis mailing list
>> Eg6_analysis at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/eg6_analysis
> _______________________________________________
> Eg6_analysis mailing list
> Eg6_analysis at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/eg6_analysis