[Eg6_analysis] GPP smearing position factors for the DCs

[Stepan Stepanyan]

OK, I missed that part that data were processed with gpp without smearing.
Yes, I agree with Nathan, use user_ana on data from GSIM, without gpp.
I am wondering what gpp does.

Stepan
On 11/20/14, 8:10 PM, Nathan Baltzell wrote:
> Hi Mohammad & Stepan,
>
> Those plots are for superlayers (SL), integrated over all sectors.  Right?
>
> Is it correct that simulation is already much broader than data with no smearing?
>
> Why use more run numbers in the database just to disable gpp?
> Why not be sure and just don't run gpp at all?
>
> -Nathan
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org> wrote:
>
>> Mohammad,
>>
>> It looks like smearing factor for simulated data gets multiplied
>> from sector-to-sector.
>>
>> Stepan
>>
>> On 11/20/14 11:52 AM, Mohammad Hattawy wrote:
>>> Hello Stepan, Nathan and all,
>>>     Following our discussion yesterday about the smearing factors, Nathan has updated the database with certain runs (1 to 10) such that i can use the pass2 user_ana to cook the simulated data. In this case, I have processed few experimental and simulated data and the results can be found here:
>>>
>>> https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/EG6_::_GPP_DC_smearing
>>>
>>> Recommendations and suggestions are really welcomed.
>>> -- 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Mohammad Hattawy.