Hi Seema,<br><br>I have just comment on the run ranges for your DC calibration constants. It is better to use <br>the same partition that I used for the TOF calibration which is:<br><br>1. <b>5.7 GeV : 61107: 60600 - 61215</b><br>
2. <b>1.2 GeV : 61440: 61216 - 61482</b><br>3. <b>5.7 GeV : 61483 - 61500</b>: did you check any run of this range before and after applying <br>the new calibration constants of a 61107? <br>4. 6 GeV : I noticed that you are not using the calibration constants of the six 6 GeV runs. <br>
You have reduced them to just two run ranges instead of six, is there any reason for that? <br> i. <b>61535: 61501 - 61600 </b>! I used this run instead of 61540 strategic run! It seems that <br> you have dropped this run from your list<br>
ii. <b>61625 : 61601 - 61682</b><br>
iii. <b>61695 : 61683 - 61700 </b><br>
iv. <b>61731 : 61701 - 61777</b><br> v. <b>61778: 61778 - 61782</b><br>5. 1.2 GeV: <b>61790: 61783 - 61790</b><br>6. 6 GeV: <br> vi. <b>61819: 61791 - 61850</b><br> vii. <b>61860: 61851 - 61930</b><br>7. 1.2 GeV: <b>61935: 61931 - 62000</b><br>
<br>Best regards,<br><br>Lamiaa<br><br clear="all">************************************************************<br>* Lamiaa El Fassi email: <a href="mailto:elfassi@jlab.org">elfassi@jlab.org</a><br>
* Research Associate @ Rutgers University <br>
* Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703 <br>* Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave. <br>* Suite# 4, MS 12H3<br>* Newport News, VA. 23606<br>************************************************************<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM, <<a href="mailto:seema@jlab.org">seema@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hello Stepan,<br>
Sorry for my delayed response! I have compiled the results of DC<br>
calibration. Please have a look at the attached file DC_calib.pdf<br>
Although we see many numbers red for superlayer 5 and 6 but we can't get<br>
rid of these. Moreover these numbers are not too far off from the cut off<br>
value say 310 microns for narrow sigmas in the code. So I think we can use<br>
these constants for pass0 cooking. I made a list of the runs for different<br>
energies:<br>
(i) 60707 - 61210 (Ebeam = 5776 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61107 which is very well calibrated will be<br>
applied to this run range.<br>
(ii) 61217 - 61481 (Ebeam = 1206 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61440 to be copied.<br>
(iii) 61483 - 61496 (Ebeam = 5776 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61107 to be copied.<br>
(iv) 61507 - 61782 (Ebeam = 6064MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61778 to be copied.<br>
(v) 61787 - 61790 (Ebeam = 1269 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61935 to be copied.<br>
(vi)61791 - 61930 (Ebaem = 6064 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61860 to be copied.<br>
(vii) 61931-61972 (Ebeam = 1269 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61935 to be copied.<br>
If it's okay with you, I can go ahead and write these constants to the<br>
appropriate run ranges.<br>
Waiting for your reply,<br>
Best regards,<br>
Seema<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
> Hi Seema,<br>
><br>
> Thanks for the files. I only had a chance to look them<br>
> There seem too many red numbers. Do you think they<br>
> can be improved.<br>
> As you know we want to start the next pass0. Can you<br>
> have the best calibration constants for DC in the database<br>
> for cooking.<br>
><br>
> Regards, Stepan<br>
><br>
> On 9/4/10 3:29 PM, <a href="mailto:seema@jlab.org">seema@jlab.org</a> wrote:<br>
>> Hello Stepan,<br>
>> Hope that you are having a good weekend :-)<br>
>> I have recalibrated all the nine runs twice during the last two days.<br>
>> The<br>
>> summary sheets are in the directories<br>
>> /work/clas/disk1/seema/dc_calib_test/third_iteration_eps and<br>
>> /work/clas/disk1/seema/dc_calib_test/fourth_iteration_eps. Unfortunately<br>
>> I<br>
>> am not able to send you these results in a pdf file due to my limited<br>
>> access to the internet because I have just moved into Bloomington! But I<br>
>> can generate pdf file on Tuesday morning if I don't get access to<br>
>> internet<br>
>> over the weekend! Sorry about that!<br>
>> Best regards,<br>
>> Seema<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>> Hi Seema,<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks for the update.<br>
>>> Looking forward for the results of next iteration.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Regards, Stepan<br>
>>><br>
>>> <a href="mailto:seema@jlab.org">seema@jlab.org</a> wrote:<br>
>>>> Hello Stepan,<br>
>>>> Sorry for not being in touch with you for the last few days because I<br>
>>>> was<br>
>>>> just wrapping up my stuff to come back to US! Also my account was<br>
>>>> again<br>
>>>> locked but I have got access to it now. Regarding DC calibrations I<br>
>>>> would<br>
>>>> finish the last iteration in the next couple of days and would send<br>
>>>> you<br>
>>>> an<br>
>>>> email with the latest results. Please let me know if you need any<br>
>>>> other<br>
>>>> info and I shall be obliged to hear from you!<br>
>>>> Best regards,<br>
>>>> Seema<br>
>>>><br>
><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Lowq mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lowq@jlab.org">Lowq@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq</a><br></blockquote></div><br>