Hi Seema,<br><br>Since you are done with your DC calibration. One of us can copy the new constants to <br>the Eg6 run index. Please let me know your preference.<br><br>Best,<br><br>Lamiaa<br><br clear="all">************************************************************<br>
* Lamiaa El Fassi email: <a href="mailto:elfassi@jlab.org">elfassi@jlab.org</a><br>* Research Associate @ Rutgers University <br>* Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703 <br>
* Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave. <br>* Suite# 4, MS 12H3<br>* Newport News, VA. 23606<br>************************************************************<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <<a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org">stepanya@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hi Seema,<br>
<br>
Comparing your and Lamiaa's lists I would suggest do nothing.<br>
It should be good for this pass0.<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
Stepan</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 9/8/10 3:24 PM, <a href="mailto:seema@jlab.org">seema@jlab.org</a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hi Lamiaa,<br>
Thanks for your suggestions! I can use the same partition for DC<br>
calibration constants. But I didn't calibrate run numbers 61535 and 61790.<br>
So what to do with these two run ranges to start pass0? I can calibrate<br>
these runs by the end of this week because each run requires 4-5<br>
iterations. Also could you please submit jobs for these two runs?<br>
Best regards,<br>
Seema<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hi Seema,<br>
<br>
I have just comment on the run ranges for your DC calibration constants.<br>
It<br>
is better to use<br>
the same partition that I used for the TOF calibration which is:<br>
<br>
1. *5.7 GeV : 61107: 60600 - 61215*<br>
2. *1.2 GeV : 61440: 61216 - 61482*<br>
3. *5.7 GeV : 61483 - 61500*: did you check any run of this range before<br>
and<br>
after applying<br>
the new calibration constants of a 61107?<br>
4. 6 GeV : I noticed that you are not using the calibration constants of<br>
the six 6 GeV runs.<br>
You have reduced them to just two run ranges instead of six, is there any<br>
reason for that?<br>
i. *61535: 61501 - 61600 *! I used this run instead of 61540<br>
strategic run! It seems that<br>
you have dropped this run<br>
from your list<br>
ii. *61625 : 61601 - 61682*<br>
iii. *61695 : 61683 - 61700 *<br>
iv. *61731 : 61701 - 61777*<br>
v. *61778: 61778 - 61782*<br>
5. 1.2 GeV: *61790: 61783 - 61790*<br>
6. 6 GeV:<br>
vi. *61819: 61791 - 61850*<br>
vii. *61860: 61851 - 61930*<br>
7. 1.2 GeV: *61935: 61931 - 62000*<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Lamiaa<br>
<br>
************************************************************<br>
* Lamiaa El Fassi email: <a href="mailto:elfassi@jlab.org">elfassi@jlab.org</a><br>
* Research Associate @ Rutgers University<br>
* Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703<br>
* Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.<br>
* Suite# 4, MS 12H3<br>
* Newport News, VA. 23606<br>
************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM,<<a href="mailto:seema@jlab.org">seema@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hello Stepan,<br>
Sorry for my delayed response! I have compiled the results of DC<br>
calibration. Please have a look at the attached file DC_calib.pdf<br>
Although we see many numbers red for superlayer 5 and 6 but we can't get<br>
rid of these. Moreover these numbers are not too far off from the cut<br>
off<br>
value say 310 microns for narrow sigmas in the code. So I think we can<br>
use<br>
these constants for pass0 cooking. I made a list of the runs for<br>
different<br>
energies:<br>
(i) 60707 - 61210 (Ebeam = 5776 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61107 which is very well calibrated will be<br>
applied to this run range.<br>
(ii) 61217 - 61481 (Ebeam = 1206 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61440 to be copied.<br>
(iii) 61483 - 61496 (Ebeam = 5776 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61107 to be copied.<br>
(iv) 61507 - 61782 (Ebeam = 6064MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61778 to be copied.<br>
(v) 61787 - 61790 (Ebeam = 1269 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61935 to be copied.<br>
(vi)61791 - 61930 (Ebaem = 6064 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61860 to be copied.<br>
(vii) 61931-61972 (Ebeam = 1269 MeV)<br>
Constants of run number 61935 to be copied.<br>
If it's okay with you, I can go ahead and write these constants to the<br>
appropriate run ranges.<br>
Waiting for your reply,<br>
Best regards,<br>
Seema<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hi Seema,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the files. I only had a chance to look them<br>
There seem too many red numbers. Do you think they<br>
can be improved.<br>
As you know we want to start the next pass0. Can you<br>
have the best calibration constants for DC in the database<br>
for cooking.<br>
<br>
Regards, Stepan<br>
<br>
On 9/4/10 3:29 PM, <a href="mailto:seema@jlab.org">seema@jlab.org</a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hello Stepan,<br>
Hope that you are having a good weekend :-)<br>
I have recalibrated all the nine runs twice during the last two days.<br>
The<br>
summary sheets are in the directories<br>
/work/clas/disk1/seema/dc_calib_test/third_iteration_eps and<br>
/work/clas/disk1/seema/dc_calib_test/fourth_iteration_eps.<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
Unfortunately<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
I<br>
am not able to send you these results in a pdf file due to my limited<br>
access to the internet because I have just moved into Bloomington!<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
But I<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
can generate pdf file on Tuesday morning if I don't get access to<br>
internet<br>
over the weekend! Sorry about that!<br>
Best regards,<br>
Seema<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hi Seema,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the update.<br>
Looking forward for the results of next iteration.<br>
<br>
Regards, Stepan<br>
<br>
<a href="mailto:seema@jlab.org">seema@jlab.org</a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hello Stepan,<br>
Sorry for not being in touch with you for the last few days because<br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
I<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
was<br>
just wrapping up my stuff to come back to US! Also my account was<br>
again<br>
locked but I have got access to it now. Regarding DC calibrations I<br>
would<br>
finish the last iteration in the next couple of days and would send<br>
you<br>
an<br>
email with the latest results. Please let me know if you need any<br>
other<br>
info and I shall be obliged to hear from you!<br>
Best regards,<br>
Seema<br>
<br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
Lowq mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lowq@jlab.org">Lowq@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>