Hi All,<br><br>After implementing the latest Raphael's GEM modification, I have processed; as a test, a <br>file "01" of a run 61695. Its output files are located at: /work/clas/claseg6/top_dir/pass0_ngm/.<br>
Please take a look to those files and let me know if everything seems fine. That might be the <br>last test before launching the next cooking pass after the DC calibration check is done!<br><br>I would like to mention that Stepan has suggested to save all the output formats of the upcoming <br>
cooking on the tape Silo including the BOS files. So as test of my scripts, I have saved this <br>test's output files in: /mss/clas/eg6/production/pass0_ngm/.<br><br>Best regards,<br><br>Lamiaa<br><br clear="all">************************************************************<br>
* Lamiaa El Fassi email: <a href="mailto:elfassi@jlab.org">elfassi@jlab.org</a><br>* Research Associate @ Rutgers University <br>* Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703 <br>
* Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave. <br>* Suite# 4, MS 12H3<br>* Newport News, VA. 23606<br>************************************************************<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/21 Stepan Stepanyan <<a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org">stepanya@jlab.org</a>><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hi Raphael,<br>
<br>
Thanks a lot for good work. It is not too late.<br>
We are still waiting for DC calibrations to be<br>
finalized for this Pass0. So, please make the<br>
new version of the GEM code available for<br>
Lamiaa to build a new executable for the Pass0.<br>
<br>
Regards, Stepan<br>
<br>
On 9/21/10 10:52 AM, Dupré Raphaël wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Hi Stepan,<br>
<br>
I do not know if it is still in time, but I solve my "coherence" issues in the GEM code, let me know if you want to use it for the pass0.<br>
<br>
The number of track is improved by few percent more than previous version, but the running time is increased by ~30%. The good side is that the code do not use the magboltz parameters any more, the bad side is it is slower. It was +300% in my first version, I do not think I can do better without using a different fit procedure first.<br>
<br>
Anyway I will say a word about it in the next meeting.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Raphaël Dupré<br>
<br>
<br>
Argonne National Laboratory<br>
<br>
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote></div><br>