Hi Stepan,<br><br>Just yesterday Seema mentioned offline to me to recook for her the 11 calibration runs for <br>one more/last DC iteration in order to compare the new DC results with the user_ana fits results <br>after the modification that I did recently to the DC fit function. So, after implementing the helicity modification by Raffaella and using the new RTPC pads files extracted recently by Raphael, <br>
I was thinking to process her jobs first as a test, and then process the 1.2 GeV data (until now <br>I was thinking just about the elastic good runs not the full data set). Since we have now two files <br>of the hot pads I need to modify my cooking scripts to take that into account. Historically, <br>
Bonus people are keeping all the pads info in ASCII files not on database like the other CLAS subsystems. Those files must be submitted with each job otherwise it will crash. These new calibration files will split our data set into two ranges before and after a run 61482 taken on <br>
11/01/2009 and it must named as "badPads.dat" (as it's labelled inside the GEM codes). <br>What I am wondering about if two runs before/after a run 61482 are processed in the same <br>farm machine, and in case I am copying their appropriate hot pads files into "badPads.dat", <br>
those files won't overwrite each others. I think saving a disk space for each job may save <br>also their own files from being overwritten, is that right? <br><br>As for the cooking pass name, if you want to move to Pass1, we can call it Pass1_v0 and so <br>
on. What do you think? But we may start first with 1.2 GeV and when it's done we can process <br>the other data set in order to remove the TPCC bank from it, is that right?<br><br>Best regards,<br><br>Lamiaa<br><br clear="all">
************************************************************<br>* Lamiaa El Fassi email: <a href="mailto:elfassi@jlab.org">elfassi@jlab.org</a><br>* Research Associate @ Rutgers University <br>* Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703 <br>
* Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave. <br>* Suite# 4, MS 12H3<br>* Newport News, VA. 23606<br>************************************************************<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <<a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org">stepanya@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Hi Lamiaa,<br>
<br>
I was thinking to name this pass1-v1 and process all the files of
all good runs.<br>
We should have fixed, stable version of the code (may have different
outputs <br>
for 1.2 GeV and for higher energy runs). We should have stable
calibration <br>
constants (may be some difference for 1.2 GeV and for higher energy
runs).<br>
<br>
Let me know what do you think, please every one.<br>
<br>
Regards, Stepan <br><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<br>
On 12/16/10 2:05 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">Hi Stepan,<br>
<br>
Okay, I will keep then the full list of banks as pass0_v1 cooking.
But, I will add to it <br>
the TPCC calibration bank<br>
<br>
Since the cooking will include only the 1.2 GeV runs, maybe it's
better to call it <br>
elastic_v1, gem_v1 or pass0_gv1. What do you think?<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Lamiaa<br>
<br clear="all">
************************************************************<br>
* Lamiaa El Fassi email: <a href="mailto:elfassi@jlab.org">elfassi@jlab.org</a><br>
* Research Associate @ Rutgers University <br>
* Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703 <br>
* Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave. <br>
* Suite# 4, MS 12H3<br>
* Newport News, VA. 23606<br>
************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Stepan
Stepanyan <<a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org">stepanya@jlab.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Hi Lamiaa,<br>
<br>
Please cook everything A** and B** files. Week of cooking
seems just<br>
on time before holidays.<br>
I assume you are talking about IC reconstruction banks. If
we keep IC <br>
information I would prefer to have hodoscope's
reconstruction banks <br>
as well, SCHB and SCPB. <br>
<br>
One question, what you will name this pass, Pass0_v2?<br>
<font color="#888888"> <br>
Stepan <br>
</font>
<div>
<div> <br>
On 12/16/10 9:42 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">Hi Stepan,<br>
<br>
For the software, I will leave the two outputs [1]
& [3] combined for this cooking too.<br>
However, I will add the helicity modification when
Raffaella is done with it.<br>
<br>
As for 1.2 GeV runs, we have two run periods. First
from 61216 till 61482 with <br>
109 production runs. Second set is from 61931 till
61966 with 25 production runs.<br>
So, a total of 134 runs will be processed. Those run
numbers is based on the list <br>
of good runs study that I did after the pass0_v1
cooking. Some of these runs are <br>
very long. They contain more than hundred files which
means A* and B* extension <br>
on the raw data. Until now I am processing just the A
extension, shall I add the B files <br>
also to this cooking? I can expect that this cooking
will be done in maximum one week <br>
depends on how much Auger will be busy in this
period? <br>
<br>
As for the output files, usually I am producing just
the SEB NT10 ntuple and the BOS <br>
files when I am cooking to Raphael. But in case some
other people might be interested <br>
to analyse these data, I may produce the full list of
output files:<br>
- ROOT files: CLASTOOL & H2ROOT root ntuples.<br>
- SEB Nt10 ntuple.<br>
- BOS files<br>
- ANAHIST hbook file<br>
- Helicity correction file <br>
- LOG files<br>
I will manage to save the SEB ntuple in the claseg6
work disk and copy all others files to <br>
the auto-managed work disk but they will be linked to
the claseg6 work disk. I will leave the <br>
IC banks active on those outputs but if there is no
objection I may turn off the hodoscope <br>
banks.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Lamiaa<br>
<br clear="all">
************************************************************<br>
* Lamiaa El Fassi email: <a href="mailto:elfassi@jlab.org">elfassi@jlab.org</a><br>
* Research Associate @ Rutgers University <br>
* Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
<br>
* Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
<br>
* Suite# 4, MS 12H3<br>
* Newport News, VA. 23606<br>
************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:28
PM, Stepan Stepanyan <<a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org">stepanya@jlab.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> Hi Lamiaa,<br>
<br>
You can leave changes for DC as they are, no
problem.<br>
For 1.2 GeV one output [1] will be enough. But
if you<br>
do not want to touch the code you can leave as
it is<br>
[1] and [3]. Since this is again mostly for
Raphael for<br>
the RTPC calibration, we do not want to select
events <br>
with restriction on a track in RTPC.<br>
<br>
How long the cooking of 1.2 GeV takes, all the
files of <br>
all good runs.<br>
<br>
Thanks, Stepan <br>
<div>
<div> <br>
On 12/15/10 2:46 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">Hi Stepan,<br>
<br>
Up to now, user_ana codes are up-to-date
since we didn't do any changes since <br>
the previous cooking except the DC initial
fit parameters that I changed to make <br>
them similar to dc3. Shall I leave them
like that?<br>
In the previous cooking we decided to
combine <br>
- [1] a negatively charged TB track<br>
- [3] a positively charged track with at
least 2 neutrals (in any EC - IC
combinations)<br>
in the produced bos file. We turned off
the other two outputs:<br>
- [2] a good electron and a positively
charged particle (I made a change)<br>
- [4] at least 1 track in RTPC and at
least 2 neutrals in (any EC - IC
combinations)<br>
<br>
I think last cooking choice is okay for
the RTPC calibration since I already used
it on <br>
some cooking for Raphael, unless you may
want to add the RTPC track to this <br>
cooking outputs. Please let me know which
output configuration shall we use in this
<br>
cooking.<br>
<br>
I will wait for the new helicity
modification by Raffaella to implement it
into our <br>
cooking packages. She already contacted me
to get the tcl file to run some test <br>
after the helicity modification that she
did to her cooking codes version. <br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Lamiaa<br>
<br>
<br clear="all">
************************************************************<br>
* Lamiaa El Fassi email: <a href="mailto:elfassi@jlab.org">elfassi@jlab.org</a><br>
* Research Associate @ Rutgers
University <br>
* Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757)
269-5703 <br>
* Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
<br>
* Suite# 4, MS 12H3<br>
* Newport News, VA. 23606<br>
************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 14,
2010 at 9:32 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <<a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org">stepanya@jlab.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Hi Lamiaa,<br>
<br>
On the meeting today we decided to
not wait for IC calibration<br>
and cook 1.2 GeV for Raphael for
RTPC work. What we need to<br>
do is to make sure code is up to
date. Raffaella mentioned that<br>
she can add helicity calculations
into it within this week. For<br>
1.2 GeV we do not need any output
but electron events. <br>
Let's work towards having everything
ready for 1.2 GeV cooking,<br>
all of the good runs, by the end of
the week. Let me know what<br>
we are missing and what we need to
accomplish this goal.<br>
<br>
Thanks, Stepan
<div>
<div><br>
<br>
On 12/13/10 9:49 PM, Lamiaa El
Fassi wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">Hi
Stepan,<br>
<br>
Sure we can talk about that
whenever you want. Please let
me know when <br>
it's convenient for you and I
will call you.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Lamiaa<br>
<br clear="all">
************************************************************<br>
* Lamiaa El Fassi
email: <a href="mailto:elfassi@jlab.org">elfassi@jlab.org</a><br>
* Research Associate @
Rutgers University <br>
* Phone: (757) 269-7011 //
Fax: (757) 269-5703
<br>
* Jefferson Lab., 12000
Jefferson Ave.
<br>
* Suite# 4, MS 12H3<br>
* Newport News, VA. 23606<br>
************************************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On
Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:23
PM, Stepan Stepanyan <<a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org">stepanya@jlab.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> Hi
Lamiaa,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the email.
Sorry we did not cross
today. I am<br>
on "vacation" but I come
for few meetings.<br>
<br>
One thing I wanted to
talk to you is the
preparation of the<br>
software for the next
cooking, including
outputs. I guess<br>
we can do it offline. <br>
<br>
Have a safe flight.<br>
<font color="#888888"> <br>
Stepan <br>
</font>
<div>
<div> <br>
On 12/13/10 6:10 PM,
Lamiaa El Fassi
wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Hi Stepan,<br>
<br>
I was willing to
stop by to talk
to you today but
I didn't have a
chance to do so
and it seems you
are on vacation.
I am leaving
tomorrow morning
and I am not
able to attend
the meeting
since my flight
is on the same
meeting time.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Lamiaa<br>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif"><b><i>Sent
from my
MOTOBLUR™
smartphone on
AT&T</i></b></font></div>
<br>
<br>
-----Original
message-----<br>
<blockquote>
<div><b>From: </b>Stepan
Stepanyan <a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org"><stepanya@jlab.org></a><b><br>
To: </b><a href="mailto:eg6_analysis@jlab.org">eg6_analysis@jlab.org</a>, <a href="mailto:lowq@jlab.org">lowq@jlab.org</a><b><br>
Sent: </b>Mon,
Dec 13, 2010
16:50:34
GMT+00:00<b><br>
Subject: </b>[Lowq]
Meeting
tomorrow<br>
<br>
</div>
Dear all,<br>
<br>
We will have eg6
meeting tomorrow
Tuesday,
December 14, at
9:30am<br>
in room B101.<br>
Agenda items can
be found at -<br>
<a href="http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Meeting_on_December_14_at_9:30am">http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Meeting_on_December_14_at_9:30am</a><br>
<br>
Calling
instructions can
be found at :<br>
<a href="http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Agendas_and_Minutes_of_the_meetings">http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Agendas_and_Minutes_of_the_meetings</a>
<br>
.<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards, Stepan<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Lowq mailing
list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lowq@jlab.org">Lowq@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq</a><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>