<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi Mohammad,<br><br>Upon your request, I have processed the full list of 1.2 GeV 4He runs (117 runs). <br>The HROOT outputs are saved in the following directory: <br>
/volatile/clas/claseg6/gempass1_v1/1p2gev/HROOT/.<br><br>As for your request to process 400K events for the other beam energies, I processed <br>the first two bosfiles (*.A00 & *.A01) for 5.7 GeV runs since the 1st bos has less than <br>
the events requested. These HROOT files are saved in this directory: <br>/volatile/clas/claseg6/gempass1_v1/5p7gev/HROOT/.<br><br></div>I am currently processing the same two files of 6 GeV runs even if the 1st bos has more <br>
than 400K events. In case there is an issue with the 1st bos you may use the second one. <br>I will let you know when the cooking of 6 GeV dataset is done.<br><br></div>Regards,<br><br></div>Lamiaa<br>
<div><div><div><br><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Mohammad Hattawy <<a href="mailto:mohammad.hattawy@gmail.com">mohammad.hattawy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Hello all, <div>
So, we all agree that HROOT output files will be enough, and we do not need BOS files.</div>
<div>Lamiaa, you can go with the cooking if this is fine.</div><div><br></div><div>
Regards,</div><div>Mohammad.</div></div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Nathan Baltzell <<a href="mailto:baltzell@anl.gov">baltzell@anl.gov</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><u></u>
<div><div>Hello Mohammad,</div><div><br></div><div>HROOT with TPCC will have all raw info about all hits in all reconstructed</div><div>tracks. Lamiaa's tcl that was attached does have the "ltpcc_nt_do" flag,</div>
<div>which will turn on the TPCC variables in the ntuple.</div><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>-nathan</div></font><div><div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 02:58:48 -0500, Mohammad Hattawy <<a href="mailto:mohammad.hattawy@gmail.com">mohammad.hattawy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><br><blockquote>
<div dir="ltr">Hello Lamiaa, <div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font><div> For the run lists, we need all the 1.2 GeV runs with 4He target, and the first file of each run of 5.7 GeV and 6 GeV. If it is easier for you to pick a fixed number of statistics from each run, I would say we need the first 400 000 events from all the 6 and 5.7 GeV. </div>
<div> Regarding the output files, I would say that HROOT is enough. Nathan, do we need BOS files also? </div><div>
For the tcl file, i think it is fine.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Best regards, </div><div>Mohammad.</div></div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi <<a href="mailto:lamiomar@gmail.com">lamiomar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div>Hi Raphael,<br><br></div>In case the information that you need is included in the TPCC bank, as Nathan mentioned, <br>
I may need to process few runs for you since the TPCC, which is a calibration bank, was not <br>
turned on in the pass1v1 production pass. For this task I am suggesting the following:<br><br></div>1. Could you check different beam energy run lists posted in the cooking link (<a href="https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Cooking_Notes">here</a>) and pick <br>
the runs that you want me to process? Please specify also how much statistics you may need <br>for each run!<br></div>2. Could you specify also the type of output files that you need; BOS or HROOT files or both? <br>In this case I will save the output files only on Volatile disk not on Silo. <br>
</div>3. Could you check the attached tcl file which I am usually using for the RTPC calibration to see <br>if all what you need for this RTPC calibration check is included?<br><br></div>Best regards,<br><br></div>Lamiaa<br>
</div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Nathan Baltzell <<a href="mailto:baltzell@anl.gov">baltzell@anl.gov</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">Hi Raphaël,<br>
<br>
Yes, I think the TPCC bank should be sufficient. It has TDCs, raw ADCs,<br>
and also gain-calibrated ADCs for every hit used in the GCPB bank, which<br>
has some very loose cuts to remove junk tracks. Each TPCC hit has a<br>
pointer to the GCPB track it was associated with. That raw information<br>
cannot be gotten from only cooked pass1v1 data.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Nathan<div><div><br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:57:52 -0500, Dupré Raphaël <<a href="mailto:raphael.dupre@gmail.com">raphael.dupre@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Dear Lamiaa and Nathan,<br>
<br>
We are starting to work again on the RTPC calibration. One of the<br>
points that we would like to check is that the calibration is not<br>
changing during the run.<br>
<br>
We would need the detailed tpc bank which includes (raw adc, tdc, ...)<br>
for all the 1.2 GeV runs, and the first file of all the 5.7 and 6 GeV<br>
runs.<br>
<br>
My first question to Nathan, does the TPCC bank information is good<br>
for this and does it provides raw ADC? (raw ADC are for other tests<br>
later, but we will eventually need them too) Else, what should we use?<br>
<br>
Then could Lamiaa cook the runs mentionned above? or maybe they can be<br>
extracted from BOS files from the pass1v1 cooking?<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Raphaël Dupré<br>
</blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Best regards,<br>Mohammad Hattawy.<br>
</div>
</blockquote><br><br><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Best regards,<br>Mohammad Hattawy.<br>
</div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>