<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>
<style type="text/css">body { font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:12px}</style>
</head>
<body><div>Hi Mohammad,</div><div><br></div><div>Looks like you also picked up a region of phi that didn't even exist before (~2.2 rad)!</div><div><br></div><div>Is it correct that there is 60% increase even in the 1.2 GeV runs that were being used</div><div>for the previous calibrations? I thought old and new drift speed were consistent there?</div><div><br></div><div>And can you tell me where these newly cooked 10 runs are?</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Nathan</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:57:42 -0600, Mohammad Hattawy <mohammad.hattawy@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div><br><blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0.80ex; border-left: #0000FF 2px solid; padding-left: 1ex"><div dir="ltr">Dear all, <div> As we have seen from the previous studies, the drift speed is changing during the experiment. I have been working on correcting the drift speed. New correcting parameters are extracted and implemented in the cooking package. Selected 10 test runs were recooked with these new modifications.</div>
<div> </div><div> I did a study of the performance of these corrections. <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:19.1875px">As a result, we collect more good tracks in the RTPC</span>. This incease is ranging from 60% to 126%. A detailed study can been found here: <a href="https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Drift_Speed_Correction:_Results">https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Drift_Speed_Correction:_Results</a></div>
<div><br></div><div> Comments and suggestions are greatly appreciated.</div><div><div><br></div>-- <br>Best regards,<br>Mohammad Hattawy.<br>
</div></div>
</blockquote><br><br><br></body></html>