<div dir="ltr">Hello Nathan and all, <div> Regarding your question about the plots of the superlayers, yes it is integrated over all the sectors.</div><div>For the case of running without gpp at all, in fact gsim_bat set by default the run number to 100, while gpp set the default run number to 1. So, if i would like to skip the gpp, the simulated data after gsim will have run number 100. I attached a text file for the user_ana running error of this case.</div><div><br></div><div>Typically, there are two solutions, the easiest is to add a run number of 100 in the data base. The second is to change the implantation of the default run number of gsim, compile, and then simulate the data.</div><div><br></div><div>Let me know what do u think about this.</div><div><br></div><div>-Mohammad.</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org" target="_blank">stepanya@jlab.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">OK, I missed that part that data were processed with gpp without smearing.<br>
Yes, I agree with Nathan, use user_ana on data from GSIM, without gpp.<br>
I am wondering what gpp does.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Stepan</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On 11/20/14, 8:10 PM, Nathan Baltzell wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Mohammad & Stepan,<br>
<br>
Those plots are for superlayers (SL), integrated over all sectors. Right?<br>
<br>
Is it correct that simulation is already much broader than data with no smearing?<br>
<br>
Why use more run numbers in the database just to disable gpp?<br>
Why not be sure and just don't run gpp at all?<br>
<br>
-Nathan<br>
<br>
<br>
On Nov 20, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <<a href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org" target="_blank">stepanya@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Mohammad,<br>
<br>
It looks like smearing factor for simulated data gets multiplied<br>
from sector-to-sector.<br>
<br>
Stepan<br>
<br>
On 11/20/14 11:52 AM, Mohammad Hattawy wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hello Stepan, Nathan and all,<br>
Following our discussion yesterday about the smearing factors, Nathan has updated the database with certain runs (1 to 10) such that i can use the pass2 user_ana to cook the simulated data. In this case, I have processed few experimental and simulated data and the results can be found here:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/EG6_::_GPP_DC_smearing" target="_blank">https://clasweb.jlab.org/<u></u>rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/<u></u>EG6_::_GPP_DC_smearing</a><br>
<br>
Recommendations and suggestions are really welcomed.<br>
-- <br>
Best regards,<br>
Mohammad Hattawy.<br>
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Best regards,<br>Mohammad Hattawy.<br></div>
</div>