<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Mohammad,<br>
<br>
You should be able to specify run number for GSIM in your ffread
card.<br>
You can set it to 1 or whatever you need.<br>
<br>
Stepan <br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/21/14 7:28 AM, Mohammad Hattawy
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGFoRidOhEs8iLqZ=TiYy60xwePBLnrDHiTAaT3uQ+iXpY2-qA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hello Nathan and all,
<div> Regarding your question about the plots of the
superlayers, yes it is integrated over all the sectors.</div>
<div>For the case of running without gpp at all, in fact
gsim_bat set by default the run number to 100, while gpp set
the default run number to 1. So, if i would like to skip the
gpp, the simulated data after gsim will have run number 100. I
attached a text file for the user_ana running error of this
case.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Typically, there are two solutions, the easiest is to add a
run number of 100 in the data base. The second is to change
the implantation of the default run number of gsim, compile,
and then simulate the data.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Let me know what do u think about this.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-Mohammad.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Stepan
Stepanyan <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org" target="_blank">stepanya@jlab.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">OK, I
missed that part that data were processed with gpp without
smearing.<br>
Yes, I agree with Nathan, use user_ana on data from GSIM,
without gpp.<br>
I am wondering what gpp does.<span class="HOEnZb"><font
color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Stepan</font></span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
On 11/20/14, 8:10 PM, Nathan Baltzell wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Mohammad & Stepan,<br>
<br>
Those plots are for superlayers (SL), integrated over
all sectors. Right?<br>
<br>
Is it correct that simulation is already much broader
than data with no smearing?<br>
<br>
Why use more run numbers in the database just to
disable gpp?<br>
Why not be sure and just don't run gpp at all?<br>
<br>
-Nathan<br>
<br>
<br>
On Nov 20, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:stepanya@jlab.org" target="_blank">stepanya@jlab.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Mohammad,<br>
<br>
It looks like smearing factor for simulated data
gets multiplied<br>
from sector-to-sector.<br>
<br>
Stepan<br>
<br>
On 11/20/14 11:52 AM, Mohammad Hattawy wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hello Stepan, Nathan and all,<br>
Following our discussion yesterday about the
smearing factors, Nathan has updated the database
with certain runs (1 to 10) such that i can use
the pass2 user_ana to cook the simulated data. In
this case, I have processed few experimental and
simulated data and the results can be found here:<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/EG6_::_GPP_DC_smearing"
target="_blank">https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/EG6_::_GPP_DC_smearing</a><br>
<br>
Recommendations and suggestions are really
welcomed.<br>
-- <br>
Best regards,<br>
Mohammad Hattawy.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div class="gmail_signature">Best regards,<br>
Mohammad Hattawy.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>