[Eic-core-phys] [EXTERNAL] CORE SIDIS deliverables & next WG mtg.: Nov. 11, 9am Eastern (3pm CET 6pm Yerevan)

Alexey Prokudin avp5627 at psu.edu
Mon Nov 8 11:23:25 EST 2021


Hi Gunar,

I should be able to join on Thursday. Please, send the zoom link to me. 
I did not receive one for today's meeting.

Cheers,

   Alexei


>
> Dear CORE DIS & SIDIS enthusiasts,
>
> as just discussed, we will reconvene
>
>   +++ Thursday Nov. 11th, 2021 - 9am Eastern, 3pm CET & 6pm Yerevan +++
>
> and also next Monday (same time) to continue our discussion of CORE 
> simulations.
>
>
> As promised, here some of the plots/results that should/could make it 
> into the proposal:
>
> 1) resolutions in inclusive DIS variables (Yordanka?)
>
> 2) p-eta plots for different energy settings (I suggest to have plots
>  for all energy settings, but include in the proposal perhaps 2 or 3
>  more "extreme" settings -- just to get a flavor of the change of
>  acceptance with change of energy
>     o superimpose PID coverage (could be done by Pawel/myself using
>      some illustrator program on kaon distribution
>          => what about pions and (anti)protons?
>
>
> 3) SIDIS-variable distributions (in particular z, Phperp)
>     o effect of both  general acceptance and also of PID coverage
>     o ideally, do this in x-Q2 "bins"
>
> 4) closely related, resolutions of SIDIS variables, incl. also phi
>
> 5) impact I: statistical precision of SIDIS cross section in bins of
>  (x,y,z, Phperp) [or (x,Q2,z,Phperp)].
>     => input to TMD fitter (Alexey) for impact study
>
> 6) impact II: assign spin states to originally unpolarized PYTHIA
>  simulation (see, e.g., Appendix C of JHEP 12 (2020) 010;
>  https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__inspirehep.net_files_c79d4a2a0c3319d30b767deefa17d6fc&d=DwIBAg&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=_0T78F5C8bqJytnOo0hvRuPizCo6BAxxp5d5sSvBRn4&m=vHT2vovp9TqQqgr8lKpYdtZMV9Q8y1TqMAP1KcfWBSMpukcVjRw0v7Zd7oUJbjmr&s=ZRPUWUNSPYJlfyWxWTZZvacNV_1f_TPpZDDfqYd6Moo&e= 
> )
>  based on models of A_LL or Sivers A_UT; extract those asymmetries and
>     o compare reconstructed asym's to model input
>     o impact studies by phenomenology (Alexey)
>
>
> While the first four points I consider a "must", especially the last 
> one would be "nice to have", but we may run out of time for that.
>
> Any further ideas are of course welcome.
>
> Best regards,
> Gunar
>
>
>
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Alexei Prokudin                 | Tel:     +1 (610) 396 6160
  Associate Professor of Physics  | Fax:     +1 (610) 396 6024
  Division of Science             | E-mail:  prokudin at psu.edu
  Penn State University Berks     | E-mail:  prokudin at jlab.org
  Tulpehocken Road                | Office:  Luerssen-212J
  111 Luerssen Bld.               | https://userweb.jlab.org/~prokudin/
  PO BOX 7009                     |
  Reading, PA 19610               |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the EIC-CORE-phys mailing list