<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Dear all,</p>
<p>==> This is a reminder of our joint meeting of the exclusive
processes and the semi-inclusive processes at <b>JLEIC preferred
energies</b> (sqrt(s)= 20 - 60..80 GEV ?). <br>
</p>
<p>As there may be need for input from the accelerator/interaction
region side I cc'ed Andrei and Todd. </p>
<p>==> If you like to present some results of simulations for
physics processes, or you want to bring up other topics, please
prepare some slides. <br>
</p>
<p>==> The other main topic will be to review the outcome of the
YR Temple meeting last week, and what we may conclude on how to
proceed with our studies to better define the performance
parameters of the detector (related to the "2nd IR") that we need
to specify as input for the YR effort, and in preparation for the
Pavia YR meeting in May. As a series of simulations have been done
(even so not completed yet) we should try narrow down some of the
requirements on momentum/energy resolution, particle id
requirements for the different polar angle (pseudorapidity) ranges
as they are defined in the Detector Handbook table (attachments).
<br>
</p>
<p>If you can, please address (some of) these questions:</p>
<p>1) Are there constraints on the <b>momentum/energy resolution</b>
for any of the pseudorapidity ranges defined in the table.</p>
<p>2) Are there constraints on the<b> resolution</b><b> in polar
angle or azimuth angle </b>for any of the pseudorapidity ranges
defined in the table.</p>
<p>3) Are there constraints on <b>charged particle identification</b>
(pions, kaons, protons) versus momentum range? <br>
</p>
<p>4) Are their constraints on electromagnetic <b>calorimetry
granularity </b>in order to separate single photons from pi0
decay photons? <br>
</p>
<p>5) What are the <b>energy resolution requirements for
electromagnetic calorimetry</b> versus pseudorapidity? <br>
</p>
<p>6) Is <b>hadronic calorimetry</b> needed and in what ranges? <br>
</p>
<p>7) Are there any requirements on <b>transverse vertex resolution</b>,
especially for decaying particles. <br>
</p>
<p>8) others <br>
</p>
<p>I realize it is short notice, but please try to do your best to
have some answers (even if preliminary). <br>
</p>
<p>As needed, please coordinate with Anselm, Charles, and myself.
<br>
</p>
<p>Best regards, </p>
<p>Volker <br>
</p>
</body>
</html>