[FFA_CEBAF_Collab] new version of JULO talk

[Jay Benesch]

No.  Your summary slide bears no resemblance to the current state of the model.  

________________________________________
From: Alex Bogacz <bogacz at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 4:05 PM
To: Jay Benesch; ffa_cebaf_collab at jlab.org
Subject: RE: new version of JULO talk

One more suggestion:
I would add a 'summary' slide (slide 11) before your 'reality' slides.
The slide lists expected beam parameters, emittance, momentum spread etc.so it is useful to refer in your 'reality' check...
(appended draft)

-----Original Message-----
From: FFA_CEBAF_Collab <ffa_cebaf_collab-bounces at jlab.org> On Behalf Of Alex Bogacz via FFA_CEBAF_Collab
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 3:40 PM
To: Jay Benesch <benesch at jlab.org>; ffa_cebaf_collab at jlab.org
Subject: Re: [FFA_CEBAF_Collab] new version of JULO talk

Updated slide 5 with current FFA cell configuration and Optics Corrected slide 8: was a bit 'unglued',  more labels added (appended draft)

-----Original Message-----
From: FFA_CEBAF_Collab <ffa_cebaf_collab-bounces at jlab.org> On Behalf Of Jay Benesch via FFA_CEBAF_Collab
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 3:21 PM
To: ffa at cebaf <ffa_cebaf_collab at jlab.org>
Subject: [FFA_CEBAF_Collab] new version of JULO talk

incorporating suggestions from Stephen, Ryan and Dejan