[Frost] meeting

[Igor Strakovsky]

Eugene,

I have a long shot question for future consideration

Can we expect asymmetries from FROST as E, G, H, and so on
or E*DSG, G*DSG, H*DSG, and so on?

Thanks, Igor

On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:21:32 -0400, Eugene Pasyuk 
<pasyuk at jlab.org> wrote:

> Hi Volker,
> 
> Let's discuss it today. 
> My understanding is that so far no one did any normalization 
>yet.
> One reason is that we don't have precise target polarization 
>yet.
> Photon flux for all circularly polarized files is available. 
> 
> 
> -Eugene
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 09:04 -0400, Volker Crede wrote:
>> Eugene,
>> 
>> I have noticed recently that Sungkyun has simply been using 
>>the same 
>> number of files to normalize the different target 
>>polarizations. We have 
>> now switched to normalizing at least according to the total 
>>number of 
>> events in these files. Maybe we should briefly discuss how 
>>others are 
>> doing it.
>> 
>> Should we start looking into a proper photon flux 
>>determination to get a 
>> better normalization?
>> 
>>     Volker
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Eugene Pasyuk wrote:
>> 
>> > We will have our usual meeting tomorrow, Wednesday August 
>>19 at 11:00
>> > EDT. 
>>http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g9/wiki/index.php/August_19%2C_2009
>> > Add/update your links.
>> >
>> >
>> > -Eugene
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Frost mailing list
>> > Frost at jlab.org
>> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
>> >
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
>Frost mailing list
>Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost