[Frost] Brian's NStar writeup V3

[Michael Dugger]

Eugene,

Regarding figure 3:
If we could print the plots in color, or the plot was less busy, then I 
think that adding the line at zero would be nice for the reader. 
However, the contribution is going to be printed in black and white. As it 
stands now, Brian has three lines on the plot: eta-MAID (dotted); 
Bonn-Gotchina (dashed), and SAID (solid). I think that adding a line at 
zero is going to make the plots more difficult to explain and to look at.

I have attached a copy of Brian's plots (figure 3) with the requested line 
at zero (exciteNew3.gif).

What do you think: Keep the line at zero, or remove it?

Take care,
Michael


On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Eugene Pasyuk wrote:

> Abstract: second occurrence FroST -> FROST
>
> Experiment: second line Experimental -> experimental or just drop it,
> leave simply Hall B.
> Last paragraph: probably it does not make sense to mention GPID here. It
> is meaningless for anyone outside of CLAS. For the proceeding it would
> be sufficient to say that the time-of-flight information and
> reconstructed momentum were used for particle identification. In that
> case also drop Ref. 4.
>
> Fig 3: add horizontal lines at 0
>
> -Eugene
>
> On 7/28/11 18:13 , Brian Morrison wrote:
>> Incorporated the last few changes I received.  If there are no more
>> changes by tomorrow morning I'll submit it to the speaker's committee.
>>
>> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/g9/morrison/NStar2011_MorrisonV3.pdf
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Frost mailing list
>> Frost at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
> _______________________________________________
> Frost mailing list
> Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: exciteNew3.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 14175 bytes
Desc: 
Url : https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/frost/attachments/20110729/7afaafc6/attachment.gif