[Frost] CLAS Hadron Spectroscopy WG meeting talks

[Eugene Pasyuk]

I think the fair statement about g9a carbon target contamination would be: It is still work in progress. Different approaches to the problem produce similar numerical results for corrections. We are looking into systematic uncertainty associated with this contamination.

As for the titles of your talks you guys should make them more specific. 

-Eugene

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Igor Senderovich" <senderov at jlab.org>
> To: "FROST" <frost at jlab.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:56:13 PM
> Subject: [Frost] CLAS Hadron Spectroscopy WG meeting talks
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> It looks like three of us - Sungkyun, Yuqing and I, have slots at the
> Hadron Spectroscopy session of the collaboration meeting, and Yuqing
> and I have ambiguous titles/topics at the moment. Please let me know
> if there will be contributed slides from other people to any of our
> talks and send me any slides you would like me to include in my
> presentation.
> 
> Also, what is our policy about discussing the carbon target
> contamination? Are we comfortable with some preliminary correction
> numbers being presented at this meeting?
> 
> Thank you,
> -Igor Senderovich
> _______________________________________________
> Frost mailing list
> Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
>