[Frost] abstracts for DNP

[Eugene Pasyuk]

Hi Natalie,

The last statement of mini-simposium abstract "Results from CLAS have the opportunity to significantly broaden the world database in many regards and have an impact on multipole analyses." sounds like the data may or may not make it to the database. I would drop "have the opportunity" and change it as follows: "Results from CLAS significantly broaden the world database in many regards and have an impact on multipole analyses."
It is stronger and makes the point that CLAS data already have an impact.

Otherwise abstracts are fine.

-Eugene

----- Original Message -----
> From: natalie at jlab.org
> To: frost at jlab.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:59:18 PM
> Subject: [Frost] abstracts for DNP
> 
> Hi,
> I was asked to give an overview talk of g8, g9, and g14 at the
> mini-symposium at DNP. However, in ten minutes, this seems quite
> difficult, so I will instead give an overview of kaon photoproduction
> in
> CLAS from g8 and g9. In addition, I will also give a contributed talk
> over
> my own analysis. I have attached both abstracts, similar in nature.
> Please
> let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Natalie
> _______________________________________________
> Frost mailing list
> Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost