[Frost] Question about plots

[Eugene Pasyuk]

Mike, I think it is ok to show the data as preliminary. Since you won't be able to squeeze everything in the allocated time you should pick the most interesting plots and maybe "less preliminary". Everything else you can put in summary table. 

-Eugene

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Dugger" <dugger at jlab.org>
> To: "frost" <frost at jlab.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 1:01:07 PM
> Subject: [Frost] Question about plots
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I want to know how people feel about showing old plots from FROST g9a
> data. I am in the process of trying to obtain the newest preliminary
> plots
> from g9a that have been corrected for the carbon target
> contamination, but
> there are reactions that have probably not been corrected that I'd
> still
> like to show. For example, I have old plots for G using the pi+ n
> channel
> that I'd like to show that have not been corrected for the carbon
> contamination. For the case of G we still don't have the final linear
> polarizations, and even though the polarizations are not finalized,
> we
> presented those in the past.
> 
> This is kind of a gray area. For preliminary data, we usually know
> that
> there are unresolved problems and show plots without a lot of
> hesitation.
> However, the carbon contamination is a serious problem that might be
> throwing the results off by about 10-15% for some channels.
> 
> Should I only show corrected data, or can I use the older preliminary
> data
> that we know still needs the carbon correction?
> 
> Take care,
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> Frost mailing list
> Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
>