[Frost] Follow up of last FROST meeting

[Michael Dugger]

Chan,

It is a bit of a data dump.

What is your binning going to by for the analysis? Are you really going to
report values for E_gamma near 400 MeV?

On slide 3 you show MM^2 and state that MM^2 for p < 280 MeV/c don't look
like the others. I'm not convinced that you can say much about the MM^2
shown above p = 280 MeV/c.

For your previous presentation:

https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g9/wiki/images/9/94/FROST_2019_12_18.pdf

on slide 2 you had a nice fit to the MM^2 distribution where you pulled
off a pi0 mass. Are you able to do that for the low momentum? Is it
possible that you can not pull out any pi0 from the low momentum data? I
just do not see any pi0. Am I missing something?

Take care,
Michael

>
>
>
> Dear FROST run group,
>
> Hello, below is a link to my slides for follow up of last FROST
> meeting(12/19):
> https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g9/wiki/images/e/ed/FROST_2019_12_22.pdf
>
> 1. Distributions of kinematics (MMSQ, dt, d\beta) for particles in lower
> momentum ranges are plotted to see whether lower momentum particles are of
> any use for my asymmetry calculation.
>
> 2. Proton selection, using beta difference, was revised to a simpler
> version where static cuts on beta diff are applied at +/- 0.06
>
>
> Thank you,
> Chan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Frost mailing list
> Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
>