[Frost] [EXTERNAL] Energy Loss Correction Update

[Nicholas Zachariou]

Comparing the missing mass before and after eloss also provides some evidence on the corrections. The expectation is to see the peak shifting to the right place and the resolution improving. There were also momentum corrections determined, and you should apply those as well. My analysis note has details on where you can get the corrections

Sent from my iPhone

> On 17 Nov 2019, at 09:52, Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Chen,
>  
> It is difficult to tell from these plots. To do the comparison you either plot corrected vs uncorrected momentum or difference between the two vs uncorrected momentum.
> And please send all updates to the frost mailing list to keep entire group in the loop. If the file you want to share are too large, post them on the web and send a link instead. Mailing list has limitation on the size of messages.
>  
> -Eugene
>  
> From: Chan Kim <kimchanwook at gwmail.gwu.edu> 
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 03:38
> To: Igor Strakovsky <igor at gwu.edu>; Stuart Fegan <sfegan at jlab.org>; Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Energy Loss Correction Update
>  
> Hello All,
>  
> I ran eloss to one run and compared before and after. Please see below plot of Energy and |p|. I don't know how much shift there should be, so I would appreciate if you could confirm whether eloss is applied correctly.
> <image002.png>
>  
> Thank you,
> Chan
> _______________________________________________
> Frost mailing list
> Frost at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/frost
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/frost/attachments/20191117/d52b580c/attachment.html>