[G12] Lambda Total Cross Section update.

[Eugene Pasyuk]

Johann,
What about those runs taken with different current and different 
trigger? Are they consistent with each other now?

-Eugene

Dennis Weygand wrote, On 08/19/11 19:07:
> How does the new gflux do on other cross sections? Did it change by an
> order of magnitude- isn't that the factor we were off?
> Can someone comment on this?
> Dennis
> On Aug 19, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Johann Goetz wrote:
>
>> Hi g12,
>> I couldn't get this done before the last meeting, but I did a rough
>> total cross section measurement using the most recent gflux data and
>> everything looks pretty good so far. There are a few issues I still
>> need to address, but after certain corrections (the trigger for
>> example) I believe we will have good agreement with older results from
>> CLAS/g1 and SAPHIR.
>>
>> Here is a link to the plots on the g12 wiki
>> <http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g12/wiki/index.php/G12_Xi_Paper_-_Lambda_Cross_Sections>
>>
>> I used 93 complete runs that were evenly distributed throughout g12 -
>> all production runs (no single sector runs).
>>
>> Please mull this over and get back to me with questions on Monday and
>> I can investigate further before the next meeting.
>> Have a good weekend everyone!
>> --
>> Johann T. Goetz, PhD.
>> jgoetz at ucla.edu <mailto:jgoetz at ucla.edu>
>> Nefkens Group, UCLA Dept. of Physics & Astronomy
>> Hall-B, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA
>> Office: 757-269-5465 (CEBAF Center F-335)
>> Mobile: 757-768-9999
>> _______________________________________________
>> G12 mailing list
>> G12 at jlab.org <mailto:G12 at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12
>
> --
> Dennis Weygand
> weygand at jlab.org <mailto:weygand at jlab.org>
> (757) 269-5926 (office)
> (757) 870-4844 (cell)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> G12 mailing list
> G12 at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12