[G12] note ready?

[Hicks, Kenneth]

Johann,


Just two minor things.  You'll need to revise the first paragraph about sections 6 and 7 to include the pi0 cross sections with the other two.


Also, Figure 98 seems out of place.  I couldn't see where Fig. 98 is referenced in the text, but in any case it seems odd to put this at the end of the document.  I suggest removing Figure 98 (or perhaps placing it somewhere else).


With those changes, I agree with you that it's ready to go to the committee.


Ken


________________________________
From: g12-bounces at jlab.org <g12-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Johann Goetz <goetz at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 2:22 PM
To: g12
Subject: Re: [G12] note ready?

Hi g12,
OK, I think we should now submit the g12 analysis procedures note to the committee. I added in MK's pi0 cross section and fixed all the missing/duplicate reference links that latex was complaining about. Any objections?

Current version is 1.1
here is the link:

https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g12/wiki/index.php/File:G12_procedures.pdf


On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Lei Guo <leguo at fiu.edu<mailto:leguo at fiu.edu>> wrote:
Hi, Johann,

How are you? I saw that the note has already been greatly improved, and all the cross sections are in. Are we releasing it today?

Lei


Lei Guo
Assistant Professor
Physics Department
Florida International University
Miami, FL

email: leguo at fiu.edu<mailto:leguo at fiu.edu> or lguo at jlab.org<mailto:lguo at jlab.org>
Office:305-348-0234<tel:305-348-0234>

On May 5, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Johann Goetz <theodore.goetz at gmail.com<mailto:theodore.goetz at gmail.com>> wrote:

I'm making some sweeping changes at the moment and I can add that in. Ken and I went through almost every page this morning and I think everything is looking good now. I'll finish up and increment the version to 1.0 and send a message to g12.

-- Johann<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__sites.google.com_site_theodoregoetz_&d=AwMFaQ&c=1QsCMERiq7JOmEnKpsSyjg&r=hHzTZynKAcZP6Z9X2yfO7w&m=TKT1sJ0xjB-wdWm4y0cbxyUOysDY6RMMhvLhPvnsQcg&s=6ayW2OEk_2xS54SLRnSb99fecHrQbAKmEm28LPwY4gI&e=>

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Lei Guo <leguo at fiu.edu<mailto:leguo at fiu.edu>> wrote:
I would simply add this:

During the g12 running period, Hall B does not have the priority. As a result, the polarization of the beam was delivered as a byproduct as other Halls requirement, and fluctuates. However, the majority of the g12 runs has beam polarization close to 70%.

If you think this is OK, I'll add it.


Lei Guo
Assistant Professor
Physics Department
Florida International University
Miami, FL

email: leguo at fiu.edu<mailto:leguo at fiu.edu> or lguo at jlab.org<mailto:lguo at jlab.org>
Office:305-348-0234<tel:305-348-0234>

On May 5, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Johann Goetz <theodore.goetz at gmail.com<mailto:theodore.goetz at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Lei,
Could you put a sentence in the beam polarization section saying why the polarization fluctuates from 85% to 45% and back to 75% during g12? Thanks!
-- Johann<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__sites.google.com_site_theodoregoetz_&d=AwMFaQ&c=1QsCMERiq7JOmEnKpsSyjg&r=hHzTZynKAcZP6Z9X2yfO7w&m=QRIr8CHNFkUbGxur6q-L6eEjnmFx9vwokF5k6wPr7-U&s=ly_9mmNfighLndxr3qUrFGlY3cMba6YY8TAoU1UBhzw&e=>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/g12/attachments/20150507/227462d6/attachment.html