[G12] Fwd: Meeting reminder
Andrea Celentano
andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it
Wed Dec 19 15:21:08 EST 2018
Hi MK, concerning the email, usually I get errors when sending emails to g12 due to the too large mail size, requiring the moderator to approve my email.
I'll do what you ask concerning the momentum corrections during holidays.
BestsAndrwa
-------- Messaggio originale --------Da: "Michael C. Kunkel" <mkunkel at jlab.org> Data: 19/12/18 21:00 (GMT+01:00) A: Andrea Celentano <andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it>, g12 <g12 at jlab.org> Cc: lguo <lguo at jlab.org>, "Hicks, Kenneth" <hicks at ohio.edu> Oggetto: Re: Fwd: [G12] Meeting reminder
Greetings Andrea,
It seems that I did not get this email even though you cc'd g12..
Thank you Lei for forwarding it.
I have a few questions about the fitted lines. Are the
representations derived from a projection plot or fitted to the 2D
spectrum?
Also, about the phi corrections, this shape looks very familiar.
Could you do the trivial task of applying the g12 momentum
corrections then comparing the phi of the photon before and after?
As a refresher to the rest of g12, the momentum corrections were
basically a phi correction, see the write-up.
Otherwise, I am glad that the lepton parameters of the fitter
worked. I was not able to track down why the pion parameters didn't,
as the fitter still works well for me.
BR
MK
----------------------------------------
Michael C. Kunkel, PhD
Forschungszentrum Jülich
Nuclear Physics Institute and Juelich Center for Hadron Physics
Experimental Hadron Structure (IKP-1)
www.fz-juelich.de/ikp
On 12/19/18 4:20 PM, lguo wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andrea Celentano <andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it>
Subject: Re: [G12] Meeting
reminder
Date: December 19, 2018 at 4:39:29 AM EST
To: lguo <lguo at jlab.org>
Cc: g12 <g12 at jlab.org>
Dear G12,
I’ll be on a train starting from 10AM JLAB time,
hence I don’t know if I’ll be able to join the meeting - will
try, but I don’t know about the quality of internet connection
via phone.
Concerning meeting time next year, these are my
options:
Monday: from 8 AM to 12 AM
Tuesday: from 8 AM to 12 AM
Wednsday: from 8 AM to 11.30 AM
Thursday: from 8 AM to 11 AM
Friday: from 8 AM to 11 AM
Concerning g12 photons, I realized that is not
trivial to isolate in the dataset a clean sample of gamma p
-> p pi+ pi- gamma events. I was relying on kin. fit to do so
(as done by D. Keller for his g11 corrections), selecting events
with an high (>15%) CL for the gamma p -> p pi+ pi-
(gamma) hypothesis and a low (<1%) CL for the missing pi0
hypothesis. However, when comparing the measured gamma with the
kin.fit missing gamma, I saw very broad distributions.
Therefore, I tried to repeat the procedure on the
reaction gamma p -> pi pi0 -> p e+ e- gamma. I used the
same skim as before, assigning to pi+ the e+ mass and to pi- the
e- mass and correcting the energy (not the momentum), as
suggested by MK. I saw a clean pi0 peak in the missing mass on
the proton, and I selected events by applying a 2C kin. fit on
the gamma p -> pi e+ e- (gamma) hypothesis, constraining the
e+ e- gamma to form a pi0.e
After doing so, I was able to select a very clean
set of events. The pulls and the chi2 prob. distribution look
fine. I am now in the process of deriving the corrections. I
attach a screenshot showing the difference between missing
photon energy/angles minus measured photon energy/angles as a
function of the missing photon quantities.
Bests,
Andrea
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/g12/attachments/20181219/4a7aeccb/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the G12
mailing list