[G12] Inconsistency between g12-gflux and g12runs scripts

[Andrea Celentano]

Dear all,
still on the same argument:
some files in /work/clas/clasg12/flux/good_scalar_intervals are older than 2014 (as from ls -ltrah), are these going to be deleted as part of the work disk cleanup?

Thanks
Andrea

> On Feb 6, 2019, at 18:41, Hicks, Kenneth <hicks at ohio.edu> wrote:
> 
> Andrea,
> 
> I would just skip those two runs, if I were you.  However, I’m surprised because we rant g12-gflux a few months ago and didn’t get this same message.  I wonder if some files have been accidentally deleted?
> 
> Ken
> 
> On 2/6/19, 11:44 AM, "G12 on behalf of Andrea Celentano" <g12-bounces at jlab.org on behalf of andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it> wrote:
> 
>    Dear all,
>    I used the script g12runs to determine all "good" g12 runs, as follows:
> 
>    g12runs -t prod -t flux -i
> 
>    Among the 618 runs I get, there are also 56960 and 57216. If I use the 
>    g12-gflux code to get the photon flux for runs I am interested in, that 
>    include 56960 and 57216, I see the following output:
> 
>    not found: 56960
>    not found: 57216
> 
>    Probably I can just skip these two runs in the analysis, but I'd like to 
>    check if anyone ever encountered this error.
> 
>    Bests,
>    Andrea
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    G12 mailing list
>    G12 at jlab.org
>    https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12
> 
>