<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head></head><body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal">I agree with this. All analyses that have used EVNT back require the status variables (dc_stat, etc) to be OK.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> g12-bounces@jlab.org [mailto:g12-bounces@jlab.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Haiyun Lu<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 11, 2013 12:43 PM<br><b>To:</b> Michael C. Kunkel<br><b>Cc:</b> Amaryan, Moskov; g12<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [G12] EVNT bank<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">The tracks with non-positive status in EVNT bank should be thrown away. After this, there is no big difference between EVNT and PART bank as to my knowledge.<br><br>On 09/11/2013 12:11 PM, Michael C. Kunkel wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote><p class="MsoNormal">Greetings, <br><br>To my recollection, and hopefully Dennis can remember as well since we look at this together in a G12 meeting, the problem with the EVNT bank was that there were some events where EVNT was reporting more tracks than PART. When we (Dennis and I) went back to the original uncooked files, we discovered that the extra events that EVNT was reporting had no tracks in the DC. We used CCD to verify this with a small data sample and concluded that this effect was throughout the EVNT. This conclusion makes the EVNT unusable due to the fact when we cook with a1c we do not store the DC information and we have no way of knowing which events have this no DC effect. <br><br>I know that there are some people that use EVNT, and I have questioned this numerous times. I would suggest that people using EVNT to independently verify that what I have stated is correct. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. <br><br>Also, for those interested, I am attaching my ffread card. For those using CC and EC in your simulation, set your clas_caldb <br>setenv CLAS_CALDB_RUNINDEX calib_user.RunIndexg12_mk <br>I believe that the normal CLAS_CALDB_RUNINDEX calib_user might work, but I have never verified. <br><br><br>BR <br>MK <br><br><br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>G12 mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href="mailto:G12@jlab.org">G12@jlab.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12</a><o:p></o:p></pre></blockquote><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>