<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>reaction does not matter, pi0 or anything else<br><br><div><span name="x"></span>-Eugene<span name="x"></span><br></div><br><hr id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Michael C. Kunkel" &lt;mkunkel@jlab.org&gt;<br><b>To: </b>"Eugene Pasyuk" &lt;pasyuk@jlab.org&gt;<br><b>Cc: </b>"g12" &lt;g12@jlab.org&gt;, "Johann Goetz" &lt;theodore.goetz@gmail.com&gt;<br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, March 28, 2014 4:22:52 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [G12] GFlux<br><br>
  
    
  
  
    Greetings,<br>
    <br>
    I am wondering if Johann's trip program takes into account the
    tagger hit status to be 7 or 15 as well as does the GFlux calculator
    when using the "good" option take this into account?<br>
    <br>
    Also, Eugene, when you wrote to look at the flux and yield and
    normalized yield per E-bin, would the yield of pi0 suffice?<br>
    <br>
    BR<br>
    MK<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/28/14 4:13 PM, Eugene Pasyuk
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:720603509.134399.1396037608071.JavaMail.root@jlab.org">
      <style>p { margin: 0; }</style>
      <div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:
        12pt; color: #000000">The other thing is to make sure when you
        select your events and match them to the tagger you use tagger
        hits with status 7 or 15 only.<br>
        <br>
        <div><span></span>-Eugene<span></span><br>
        </div>
        <br>
        <hr id="zwchr">
        <blockquote style="border-left:2px solid
#1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From:
          </b>"Eugene Pasyuk" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pasyuk@jlab.org" target="_blank">&lt;pasyuk@jlab.org&gt;</a><br>
          <b>To: </b>"Michael C. Kunkel" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mkunkel@jlab.org" target="_blank">&lt;mkunkel@jlab.org&gt;</a><br>
          <b>Cc: </b>"g12" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:g12@jlab.org" target="_blank">&lt;g12@jlab.org&gt;</a>, "Johann Goetz"
          <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:theodore.goetz@gmail.com" target="_blank">&lt;theodore.goetz@gmail.com&gt;</a><br>
          <b>Sent: </b>Friday, March 28, 2014 4:04:41 PM<br>
          <b>Subject: </b>Re: [G12] GFlux<br>
          <br>
          <style>p { margin: 0; }</style>
          <div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;
            font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">The way to figure out is to
            look at the flux and yield and normalized yield per E-bin,
            that is the finest binning. If they &nbsp;are consistent, the the
            problem is in re-binning procedure.&nbsp;If they are not, then we
            have to look further. Technically speaking there is not
            unusual that you may have holes on photon spectrum, that
            would just indicate that some of the counters are dead.&nbsp;
            <div><br>
              <div><span></span>-Eugene<span></span><br>
              </div>
              <br>
              <hr id="zwchr">
              <blockquote style="border-left:2px solid
#1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From:
                </b>"Michael C. Kunkel" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mkunkel@jlab.org" target="_blank">&lt;mkunkel@jlab.org&gt;</a><br>
                <b>To: </b>"Eugene Pasyuk" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pasyuk@jlab.org" target="_blank">&lt;pasyuk@jlab.org&gt;</a>,
                "Johann Goetz" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:theodore.goetz@gmail.com" target="_blank">&lt;theodore.goetz@gmail.com&gt;</a><br>
                <b>Cc: </b>"g12" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:g12@jlab.org" target="_blank">&lt;g12@jlab.org&gt;</a><br>
                <b>Sent: </b>Friday, March 28, 2014 3:55:45 PM<br>
                <b>Subject: </b>Re: [G12] GFlux<br>
                <br>
                Greetings,<br>
                <br>
                I am wondering where we are at with the flux issue?<br>
                Meaning, what is going on with the flux in the 3.5 GeV
                region?<br>
                <br>
                I feel that the flux is in error for a few reasons. <br>
                First when I bin flux in 15 MeV, I see 0 flux at 3.515 -
                3.53.<br>
                Second, when I bin flux in 50 MeV binning I see a drop
                in flux at 3.5 MeV<br>
                Here is the output<br>
                //<br>
                3.45 3.5 1.06825209003e+12<br>
                3.5 3.55 470202243457.0<br>
                3.55 3.6 1.69234003548e+12<br>
                //<br>
                <br>
                Third reason is that if you look at my attached pdf, I
                show the pi0 cross section for various energies, if you
                were to go to compare the cross sections around 3.5 GeV
                to the neighboring Egamma bins, you will notice a
                sizable discrepancy. See G12_XSection_ALL.pdf<br>
                <br>
                Fourth reason, if I were to compare the pi0 cross
                section in unit of dsigma/dt and compare it other
                experiments at 4 and 5 GeV, our cross section is off by
                a factor of 2, see t_vs_dsigdt_Compare.pdf<br>
                <br>
                In order for any g12 papers to be published, we need
                verification of cross sections, which as of this moment
                I do not believe we have.<br>
                <br>
                BR<br>
                MK<br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/25/14 10:16 PM, Eugene
                  Pasyuk wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote cite="mid:1908667858.873792.1395800206351.JavaMail.root@jlab.org">
                  <style>p { margin: 0; }</style>
                  <div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;
                    font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">This is not quite
                    correct, especially when bins are small and
                    comparable with the width of E-bin.
                    <div>Just imagine, You energy bin is 3.000-3.015
                      GeV. E-bin let's say covers 3.0121-3.0181 GeV. The
                      center of E-bin will be 3.01505 GeV. When you
                      enter this into the histogram it will fall to
                      3.015-3.030 bin then. However, this E-bin &nbsp;should
                      be split between two adjacent bins in new binning
                      scheme. There are two possible ways of doing this.
                      Either randomize energy within the width of the
                      E-bin before you enter it to th ehistogram, or
                      split it between adjacent bins using weight which
                      depends on how the bin boundary splits E-bin and
                      have two entries to the histogram with sum of the
                      weights equal one. You can imagine, if the bin
                      width is chosen to be less than the widths of
                      E-bin, then you will get completely empty bins in
                      resulting histogram.<br>
                      &nbsp;<br>
                      <div><span></span>-Eugene<span></span><br>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                      <hr id="zwchr">
                      <blockquote style="border-left:2px solid
#1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From:

                        </b>"Johann Goetz" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:theodore.goetz@gmail.com" target="_blank">&lt;theodore.goetz@gmail.com&gt;</a><br>
                        <b>To: </b>"Eugene Pasyuk" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pasyuk@jlab.org" target="_blank">&lt;pasyuk@jlab.org&gt;</a><br>
                        <b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:12:49 PM<br>
                        <b>Subject: </b>Re: [G12] GFlux<br>
                        <br>
                        <p dir="ltr">I consider the beam energy to be
                          the center of the energy paddle and fill the
                          histogram at that energy with the number if
                          counts in the gflux file. Is that wrong?</p>
                        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 25, 2014 5:59
                          PM, "Eugene Pasyuk" &lt;<a href="mailto:pasyuk@jlab.org" target="_blank">pasyuk@jlab.org</a>&gt;
                          wrote:<br>
                          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
                            #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                            <div>
                              <div style="font-size:12pt;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">I
                                see four numbers in each row in this
                                file. I figured the first one is E-bin
                                number. What are the other three? I
                                guess the second and the fourth are some
                                energies. What is the third number which
                                is integer and varies a lot.<br>
                                When you say you "histogram" does it
                                mean you take one fixed number for each
                                E-bin (beam centroid?) and put it in the
                                histogram, or something else? <br>
                                <br>
                                <div><span></span>-Eugene<span></span><br>
                                </div>
                                <br>
                                <hr>
                                <blockquote style="padding-left:5px;font-size:12pt;font-style:normal;margin-left:5px;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;text-decoration:none;font-weight:normal;border-left:2px

                                  solid #1010ff"><b>From: </b>"Johann
                                  Goetz" &lt;<a href="mailto:theodore.goetz@gmail.com" target="_blank">theodore.goetz@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
                                  <b>To: </b>"g12" &lt;<a href="mailto:g12@jlab.org" target="_blank">g12@jlab.org</a>&gt;<br>
                                  <b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, March 25, 2014
                                  5:40:42 PM<br>
                                  <b>Subject: </b>Re: [G12] GFlux<br>
                                  <br>
                                  <div dir="ltr">The output of gflux
                                    includes a file that has the
                                    energies of the individual energy
                                    paddles and the counts. These files
                                    are then used to fill a histogram in
                                    the g12-gflux script where the range
                                    and bins are specified on the
                                    command line. The energies are
                                    slightly "corrected" to the ones
                                    found in the following file:
                                    <div> &nbsp; &nbsp;
                                      /group/clas/parms/pcor/g12/tagger_energies.dat</div>
                                    <div>But, the correction is very
                                      small and averaged over the whole
                                      run period (i.e. not one a
                                      run-by-run basis).</div>
                                    <div>
                                      <div><br>
                                      </div>
                                    </div>
                                    <div>And before you ask, the the
                                      summing of the flux is valid to
                                      &nbsp;at least 4 figures - probably 5.&nbsp;</div>
                                  </div>
                                  <div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
                                    <div>-- <a href="https://sites.google.com/site/theodoregoetz/" target="_blank">Johann</a></div>
                                    <br>
                                    <br>
                                    <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar
                                      25, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Michael C.
                                      Kunkel <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:mkunkel@jlab.org" target="_blank">mkunkel@jlab.org</a>&gt;</span>
                                      wrote:<br>
                                      <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                                        .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
                                        solid;padding-left:1ex">
                                        Greetings,<br>
                                        <br>
                                        If the data shows a hole at beam
                                        energies, how does the gflux for
                                        this<br>
                                        energy have events?<br>
                                        Below is a table of Gflux for
                                        15MeV binning, which is to fine
                                        for<br>
                                        analysis but great for
                                        illustrating this question.<br>
                                        <br>
                                        Also, notice the 0 entries at
                                        3.5 GeV, and low events in
                                        neighbors.<br>
                                        FORMAT: Emin:Emax:Flux<br>
                                        <br>
                                        <br>
                                        <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                                        G12 mailing list<br>
                                        <a href="mailto:G12@jlab.org" target="_blank">G12@jlab.org</a><br>
                                        <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12</a><br>
                                      </blockquote>
                                    </div>
                                    <br>
                                  </div>
                                  <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                                  G12 mailing list<br>
                                  <a href="mailto:G12@jlab.org" target="_blank">G12@jlab.org</a><br>
                                  <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12</a><br>
                                </blockquote>
                                <br>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </blockquote>
                        </div>
                      </blockquote>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                  <br>
                  <pre>_______________________________________________
G12 mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:G12@jlab.org" target="_blank">G12@jlab.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g12</a>
</pre>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  

</blockquote><br></div></body></html>