[G14_run] Corrections for deuteron structure when extracting the neutron structure functions
Reinhard Schumacher
schumacher at cmu.edu
Mon Apr 27 15:52:17 EDT 2015
Hi All,
Our CLAS collaborators N. Guler et al. are publishing a paper on the
neutron spin structure in electroproduction at CLAS. We are all
supposed to be reading and commenting on this paper by April 29th. I
finally got to doing it today. You can find the paper at
https://clasweb.jlab.org/membership/phonebook.php
In this paper they have to face the problem of how to extract the
neutron structure from a polarized deuteron target. That is the same
issue we have been talking about for some time. They are measuring
g1(x,Q^2) via the double spin asymmetry A_para. In the limit that Q^2
goes to 0, this is about the same thing as our neutron structure
function "E".
Their solution is the following: they publish the CLAS results with no
correction for the deuteron D state, and no correction for final state
interactions. They do discuss the corrections that could be made, but
refrain from applying any.
In the former case, they cite an interesting paper written specifically
to address the depolarization effect of the deuteron D state, namely
C. Ciofi degli Atti, et al, Phys. Lett. B 376 (1996) 309-314.
The paper cites a simple formula to account for nuclear depolarization
in the deuteron, with a constant factor of (1-(3/2)P_D), where P_D is
the D-state fraction given as ~0.4-~0.6. This gives a slight
suppression of the observable relative to the free neutron. Using P_D =
0.05, this amounts to a factor of 7.5%. Note that this is quite close
to the factor that Dao and I worked out based on our extrapolation of
the measured data (though that is likely a numerical accident).
However, Ciofi delli Atti et al go on to show that this factor is quite
unreliable in the resonance region (W<2 GeV) where the majority of our
results for pi- p are located. The reason is that resonances tend to
get kinematically washed out in the deuteron, which in turn seems to
have a significant x-dependent effect on the extracted structure
functions.
My point in this message is to say, like was mentioned last week, that
we might also want to publish the results with no binding or FSI effect
corrections, but discuss our findings and beliefs about how big those
corrections might be.
Reinhard
--
______________________________________________________________________
Reinhard Schumacher Department of Physics, 5000 Forbes Ave.
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A.
phone: 412-268-5177 web: http://www-meg.phys.cmu.edu/~schumach
______________________________________________________________________
More information about the G14_run
mailing list