[G14_run] pi- p systematics
Reinhard Schumacher
schumacher at cmu.edu
Tue Nov 24 17:26:45 EST 2015
Hi g14 folks,
We have no meeting this week, but I wanted to mention something before
we all head off to eat turkey.
At the last meeting we looked at some work by Tsuneo in which he studied
shifts in E as a fraction deviation rather than an additive deviation
from the "best" values.
In Dao's thesis, he had his systematic studies in terms of additive
uncertainties. However, he also reported an equivalent multiplicative
(i.e. fractional) systematic uncertainty. This is given on page 134/135
of the thesis. This can be compared with the bottom-line result done by
others.
He and I also had some quick communication about why an additive
uncertainty might be more instructive to use than a multiplicative one.
In an analysis there is always some remaining background from target
material (which has zero asymmetry) and Delta production where an extra
pion is missing (and might have non-zero asymmetry). In fact, there is
evidence that this latter type of background has POSITIVE asymmetry
which would cause the ppim E asymmetry to shift up. It was pointed out
by one of the thesis reviewers. You can see in the top plots of Figure
4.17 (page 74) there are several black points that are POSITIVE. This
can't happen if the Delta production has zero asymmetry. I.e., dilution
can not push negative data points to positive. In this situation it
does not help to use a multiplicative rescaling.
We can talk about this at length next week.
Happy Thanksgiving holiday,
Reinhard
More information about the G14_run
mailing list