[G14_run] Markup of pi- p paper

[Dr. A.M. Sandorfi]

Dear Reinhard,

Thanks for the comments. I¹ll work through them.

Let me also ask you to weight in on the question we discussed yesterday:
having read through the draft, what¹s your considered opinion regarding
which PWAs should be shown with the data? Specifically, should we go ahead
as is in the present draft, ie. with fits that do not include the new g13
cross sections, or should we use new fits that do include the new g13 cross
sections (to strive for some consistency with a g13 paper that will come out
at roughly the same time)? For the latter option, I could easily change the
the curves in the figures to show PWA fits and multipoles that I already
have in hand, but because of a conflict with a PWA Workshop next week, we
would have to wait a few weeks to get revised couplings. Your thoughts ???

Andy





On 3/9/17, 8:45 AM, "Reinhard Schumacher" <schumacher at cmu.edu> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Attached is my mark-up of the first draft of the pi- p PRL article.
> 
> Reinhard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________
> Reinhard Schumacher         Department of Physics, 5000 Forbes Ave.
> Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A.
> phone: 412-268-5177           web: www-meg.phys.cmu.edu/~schumach
> <http://www-meg.phys.cmu.edu/~schumach>
> _____________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> G14_run mailing list
> G14_run at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g14_run

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/g14_run/attachments/20170309/814febf3/attachment.html>