[G14_run] Markup of pi- p paper

[Igor Strakovsky]

Dear Andy,

Thanks

Cheers, igor

-----
Igor Strakovsky, SAID INS The George Washington University
Tel: 571-553-8344,Skype: igors1945_2, Fax: 202-994-3001
Cell: 703-728-5627, Emails: igor at gwu.edu, igor at jlab.org

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Dr. A.M. Sandorfi <sandorfi at jlab.org>
wrote:

> Thanks Igor,
> A reference to g13 cross sections will be added.
> Andy
>
>
> On 3/9/17, 11:39 AM, "Igor Strakovsky" <igor at gwu.edu> wrote:
>
> Dear Andy, Reinhard, and all g14s,
>
> I am a passive member of the g14 team but let me make one small but
> important for me
> comment.  As far as somebody of you know, CLAS g13 paper for gn-->pi-p
> ds/dO is under the Adhoc committee review now.  We were thinking that is
> important to punch
> the fact that new CLAS E paper is coming and we did so.  Obviously, the
> same facility and the same collaboration are going to report results of
> different observables for the same reaction in about the same time.
> Unfortunately, your draft does not have any single word about CLAS g13 paper
>
> All the best,
> Igor
>
>
> -----
> Igor Strakovsky, SAID INS The George Washington University
> Tel: 571-553-8344 <(571)%20553-8344>,Skype: igors1945_2, Fax: 202-994-3001
> <(202)%20994-3001>
> Cell: 703-728-5627 <(703)%20728-5627>, Emails: igor at gwu.edu, igor at jlab.org
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Dr. A.M.  Sandorfi <sandorfi at jlab.org>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Reinhard,
>
> Thanks for the comments. I’ll work through them.
>
> Let me also ask you to weight in on the question we discussed yesterday:
> having read through the draft, what’s your considered opinion regarding
> which PWAs should be shown with the data? Specifically, should we go ahead
> as is in the present draft, ie. with fits that do not include the new g13
> cross sections, or should we use new fits that do include the new g13 cross
> sections (to strive for some consistency with a g13 paper that will come
> out at roughly the same time)? For the latter option, I could easily change
> the the curves in the figures to show PWA fits and multipoles that I
> already have in hand, but because of a conflict with a PWA Workshop next
> week, we would have to wait a few weeks to get revised couplings. Your
> thoughts ???
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/9/17, 8:45 AM, "Reinhard Schumacher" <schumacher at cmu.edu <
> http://schumacher@cmu.edu> > wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Attached is my mark-up of the first draft of the pi- p PRL article.
>
> Reinhard
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Reinhard Schumacher         Department of Physics, 5000 Forbes Ave.
> Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A.
> phone: 412-268-5177 <(412)%20268-5177> <tel:(412)%20268-5177>
>            web: www-meg.phys.cmu.edu/~schumach <
> http://www-meg.phys.cmu.edu/~schumach>  <http://www-meg.phys.cmu.edu/
> ~schumach>
> _____________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> G14_run mailing list
> G14_run at jlab.org <http://G14_run@jlab.org>
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g14_run
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> G14_run mailing list
> G14_run at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g14_run
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/g14_run/attachments/20170309/9ec666d9/attachment-0001.html>