<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'><div>Thanks, Irene!</div><div><br></div>There are no obvious irregularities in angular dependence. Looks like eloss corrects properly. <br><br><div><span name="x"></span>-Eugene<span name="x"></span><br></div><br><hr id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Irene Zonta" <irene.zonta@roma2.infn.it><br><b>To: </b>"Eugene Pasyuk" <pasyuk@jlab.org>, "Annalisa D'Angelo" <annalisa.dangelo@roma2.infn.it>, "A.M. Sandorfi" <sandorfi@jlab.org>, daoh@andrew.cmu.edu, "Peng Peng" <pp9e@virginia.edu>, hlu@jlab.org<br><b>Cc: </b>"g14 run" <g14_run@jlab.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:12:39 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>eloss check<br><br><div>Hi Eugene,</div><div>these are the plots of the second proton missing mass vs. the polar angle of each of the measured particles after and before the eloss correction.</div><img height="472" width="696" src="cid:18F56989-6253-4774-A5FD-54C6684EC566@roma2.infn.it"><img height="472" width="696" src="cid:BDD4268E-0E11-442E-A671-B842B2014E7C@roma2.infn.it"><img height="472" width="696" src="cid:00750166-571B-4E85-85DC-61D2CA598C39@roma2.infn.it"><img height="472" width="696" src="cid:0ACBC525-5E01-4E2D-AFA4-9123249744F4@roma2.infn.it"><div><br></div><div><img height="472" width="696" src="cid:091128D7-A063-4B97-8D88-0133A4D61AEF@roma2.infn.it"><img height="472" width="696" src="cid:CF5EE952-3651-465B-BF9E-BE62AE09F73A@roma2.infn.it"></div></blockquote><br></div></body></html>