[G8b_run] g8b meeting

[Eugene Pasyuk]

The correct link is http://www.jlab.org/~martdann/OMEGA_yield/UPDATES/

On 6/15/11 17:04 , Philip L. Cole wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am happy with just discussing the ISU omega results on Thursday right
> after the Frost call.  The Polarization Table results are vitally
> important and certainly need to have a dedicated discussion on Monday.  I
> really appreciate everyone agreeing to meet on Thursday for going over
> Danny's plots, which you can find on:
>
> http://jlab.org/~martdann/OMEGA_yield/UPDATES/
>
> the filename:
>
> omega_beam_asymmetry.pdf
>
> Phil
>
>
>> Hi MIcheal,
>> That would be much better. Let's keep the monday meeting for the
> polatization tables, and just talk about ISU Omega results on Thursday
> after the FROST call.
>> Cheers,
>> Ken
>>
>> On 06/15/2011 01:20 PM, Michael Dugger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> This is a bit of a mess. From what I understand, we are having a short
> g8b meeting this Thursday to discuss the ISU omega results. I was not
> aware that the Monday meeting was canceled. Has the Monday meeting been
> canceled?
>>> Here is my problem: If the new polarizations are to be discussed on
> Thursday and Ken only has an hour to attend the Thursday meeting, then
> I don't think it is wise of us to schedule anything else to be
>>> discussed.
>>> It is important for the g8b group to approve plots to be shown at the
> collaboration meeting, BUT, in no possible way, are approval of plots
> to be shown at a collaboration meeting anywhere near as important as
> Ken discussing the new polarization tables.
>>> In short: If the Monday meeting is canceled, we should not put
>>> anything on the Thursday agenda other than polarization tables. In this
> case, ISU can put the plots to be shown on the web. (But then, why
> would we even change the meeting day?)
>>> My preference is to keep the Monday meeting for the discussion of the
> polarization tables. This is important and the group went through the
> process of signing up on a doodle poll to set the time and day. It is
> just plain wrong to let ISU dictate a new day and time and then use up
> the meeting time showing plots to be shown for a collaboration
>>> meeting. I don't think Phil intended for the Monday meeting to be
> replaced. Phil: Did you?
>>> Thanks for your time.
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Michael
>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Ken Livingston wrote:
>>>> Hi Eugene and all,
>>>> OK with me, but I can't stay for more than 1 hour at that time. I've
> put the agenda on the wiki page.
>>>> https://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/g8/wiki/index.php/June_16,_2011
> Phil / Danny - can you add a link on that page.
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ken
>>>> On 06/14/2011 07:47 PM, Eugene Pasyuk wrote:
>>>>> Thursday immediately following FROST meeting would be fine. That
> would
>>>>> be around noon.
>>>>> -Eugene
>>>> --
>>>> =======================================================
>>>> Ken Livingston
>>>> Dept. of Physics&   Astronomy,        Tel: +44 141 330 6428
>>>> University of Glasgow,               Fax: +44 141 330 5889
>>>> Glasgow G12 8QQ.
>>>> Scotland. UK.
>>>> =======================================================
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> G8b_run mailing list
>>>> G8b_run at jlab.org
>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g8b_run
>>
>> --
>> =======================================================
>> Ken Livingston
>>
>> Dept. of Physics&   Astronomy,        Tel: +44 141 330 6428
>> University of Glasgow,               Fax: +44 141 330 5889
>> Glasgow G12 8QQ.
>> Scotland. UK.
>> =======================================================
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> G8b_run mailing list
>> G8b_run at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g8b_run
>>
>