[G8b_run] Meeting

[Ken Livingston]

Hi all,
Let's skip the meeting tomorrow:

a. Phil is going to submit his abstract, and that was the seed for the 
current discussion.
b. Julian is going to try and answer some questions on the phi analysis, 
but let's give him some time.
The link to the analysis review is here. It would be worth reading the 
comments before we discuss this topic again.
http://wwwold.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/hadron/wiki/index.php/Isu_g8b_phi
c. I agree with Mike - the polarization is the urgent issue. We're 
basically waiting for me (again) to confirm Mike's and Volker's analyses 
with the KLambda channel. There's sill some debuging needed with this. 
I'll email the result around as soon as I have it, and we can have a 
meeting to decide where to go next.


Cheers,
Ken



On 01/09/2012 09:19 PM, Philip Cole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can attend the meeting.  Julian cannot, but I can.
>
> Phil
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Michael Dugger <dugger at jlab.org 
> <mailto:dugger at jlab.org>> wrote:
>
>
>     Hi,
>
>     NOTE: I have copied the g8b run list to this email.
>
>     For those that have not been part of an email discussion regarding
>     the phi analysis: There was a request to have a meeting on Wed
>     11th at 12.00 EST to talk about the phi analysis, but the people
>     doing the phi analysis can't attend.
>
>     Since Julian and Phil can not attend the meeting to talk about the
>     phi analysis, I don't see any reason for us to hold a meeting
>     unless someone wants to talk about other issues.
>
>     As it stands now, we have not come to a conclusion regarding the
>     polarization correction factors. I believe that once the
>     polarization correction factors are finalized, we can do a final
>     study as to the systematic errors of the polarization, and then we
>     can all move towards publication. In fact, I have difficulty
>     seeing a reason to talk about anything that is not directly
>     related to obtaining final polarization corrections.
>
>     -Michael
>
>