[G8b_run] Message from Julian Salamanca

[Philip L. Cole]

Hi all,

Julian asked me to forward this to the g8b email distribution list.  He
does not have a JLab email account at present and hence does not have the
permissions necessary to send a message to the list.


Cheers,
Phil

--- El sáb, 1/14/12, julian salamanca <jjuliansb at yahoo.com> escribió:

> De: julian salamanca <jjuliansb at yahoo.com>
> Asunto: Phi Analysis
> A: "Volker Crede" <crede at fsu.edu>, "Ken Livingston"
<Kenneth.Livingston at glasgow.ac.uk>, "Barry Ritchie"
<Barry.Ritchie at asu.edu>, "julian salamanca" <jjuliansb at yahoo.com>, "Ken
Livingston" <k.livingston at physics.gla.ac.uk>, "Franz Klein"
<fklein at jlab.org>, "Volker Crede" <crede at hadron.physics.fsu.edu>, "g8b"
<g8b_run at jlab.org>
> Fecha: sábado, 14 de enero de 2012, 07:09 pm
> Hello everyone,
>
>
> Before going any further I have to say we can not publish
> our data until
> the new polarization tables come out (I dont know if there
> any new polarization tables, I used the old ones back in
> november 2009).
> I new since I defended my PhD the SDMEs must be
> recalculated base on these
>  new polarization tables and after we all understand
> reasonably the
> systematics on the polarization computations. The only
> thing to change in our calculations are the values of the
> mean polarizations, even if the systematics errors are 5 or
> 17%. I wrote in appendix E of the phi-meson clas analysis
> note how we got the mean polarizations in the the ranges of
> 1.7 to 1.9 and 1.9 to 2.1 GeV for PARA and PERP but for me
> was clear from the beginning of the clas-analysis rounds
> (and before it) that we have  "just" to recalculate the
> SDMEs not to re-analyze data. Moreover, the clas-analysis
> committee pointed this issue and we answered accordingly of
> what I said above.
>
>
> I hope this disentangle the discussion.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Julian