[G8b_run] Analysis note for g8b review

[dugger at jlab.org]

Ken,

The reason that we put all of the details in the analysis note is that
there is no formal way to have the CLAS-notes approved. I would prefer to
have the individual CLAS-notes approved and then just reference them in
the analysis note.

I could just make reference to the CLAS-notes but then I am just asking
the committee to collect the individual CLAS-notes and review them
separately. I think it is easier on the committee to have everything in
one document.

If others think I should take out the separate CLAS-note material and
simply reference the material in the analysis note, I'll go with that.

Take care,
Michael



> Hi Micheal,
> I've attached my comments on the CLAS note.
>
> My main comment, or question for discussion, is really about the level
> of detail you go into for things which are already documented in CLAS
> notes. My feeling is that several sections could be reduced down to a
> summary with one or 2 plots, and a reference to the relevant CLAS note.
> I think we'd be likely to get it through faster this way. For example,
> there's a very detailed section on the moment method - I think that's a
> great piece of work, but as a reviewer I'd be satisfied with an overview
> of the concept, a statement about why it's a better way, and a plot
> showing that it's consistent with the cos 2 phi method.
>
> Cheers,
> Ken
>
>
>
> On 03/02/2012 06:39 PM, Michael Dugger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have produced an analysis note for pion photoproduction that is ready
>> for the g8b group to review.
>>
>> The analysis note can be found at:
>> http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/g8b/ASU/g8bPionAnaV4.pdf
>>
>> Since it is a relatively new requirement that the g8b group have an
>> opportunity to review an analysis note previous to sending the document
>> to
>> an analysis review committee, the group has yet to set a time limit for
>> the
>> g8b review process. I feel it would be reasonable for the g8b group to
>> have one week to make suggestions and comments previous to our sending
>> the
>> analysis note to committee.
>>
>> If anyone thinks that they would like more than one week to review the
>> document, please let us know.
>>
>> Thanks for your time.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Michael
>> _______________________________________________
>> G8b_run mailing list
>> G8b_run at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g8b_run
>
>
> --
> =======================================================
> Ken Livingston
>
> Dept. of Physics&  Astronomy,        Tel: +44 141 330 6428
> University of Glasgow,               Fax: +44 141 330 5889
> Glasgow G12 8QQ.
> Scotland. UK.
> =======================================================
>
>