[G8b_run] Analysis note for KY
Volker Crede
crede at fsu.edu
Fri May 17 07:44:37 EDT 2013
David,
Unfortunately, I have not had the time to read the entire note, my apologies. Have there been any changes to your analysis due to the issues Brian discovered?
Cheers,
Volker
On May 17, 2013, at 4:50 AM, David Ireland <David.Ireland at glasgow.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I realise it was a big ask to take a look through the note in one week.
>
> However, one thing I would like everyone's opinion on is whether there
> is any need to recook the data before submitting this note for review.
> If not, we will have to have a solid set of reasons why not. I am just
> asking because that's just my impression of what is likely to happen in
> a review committee.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> On 10/05/2013 15:46, David Ireland wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I now have a draft analysis note for the g8 measurements on K-Lambda and
>> K-Sigma. This is essentially what I reported on at the last Working
>> Group meeting. As it is too big a file to circulate, you can find it at
>> http://nuclear.gla.ac.uk/~clasg8/Analysis/PatersonKLambdaAnalysis.pdf
>>
>> I would like to get this into the review process as soon as possible, so
>> could you let me have any feedback by *Friday 17 May*.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> G8b_run mailing list
> G8b_run at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/g8b_run
>
More information about the G8b_run
mailing list