[Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Re: No group meeting tomorrow

[Anatoly Radyushkin]

Hadstruct and hadstruc are abbreviations that have   the same meaning,
so I see no reason to keep an extra letter that adds no extra information.
________________________________
From: Hadstruct <hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Monahan, Christopher <cjmonahan at wm.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 6:06 PM
To: Joseph Karpie <jmkarpie at email.wm.edu>; Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org>
Cc: hadstruct at jlab.org <hadstruct at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Re: No group meeting tomorrow

PS There was significant resistance to HadStruc when I suggested it, but I don't think anyone has come up with a better alternative. I'm not backing down now.

---

Chris Monahan
Pronouns: he/his
Assistant Professor
Department of Physics
William & Mary
________________________________
From: Monahan, Christopher <cjmonahan at wm.edu>
Sent: 05 August 2020 18:05
To: Joseph Karpie <jmkarpie at email.wm.edu>; Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org>
Cc: hadstruct at jlab.org <hadstruct at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Re: No group meeting tomorrow

I believe I am responsible for the "HadStruc" suggestion and I certainly intended it to be a riff on HadSpec. I would campaign for the spelling without the "t". I would also encourage everyone to use it as much as possible so it really sticks 🙂

Regards,
Chris

---

Chris Monahan
Pronouns: he/his
Assistant Professor
Department of Physics
William & Mary
________________________________
From: Hadstruct <hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Joseph Karpie <jmkarpie at email.wm.edu>
Sent: 05 August 2020 17:57
To: Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org>
Cc: hadstruct at jlab.org <hadstruct at jlab.org>
Subject: [Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Re: No group meeting tomorrow

Hey everyone,

Since we didn't have a meeting, I didn't have a chance to ask a very important question to the group. Since the name of our call has stuck, I am assuming we are committing to this name for our collaboration. I wanted to name our collaboration on my APLatt slides. Is anyone opposed to that happening? If not, I would encourage David and Colin to do so as well.

Now the important question is, shall we call it "HadStruct" which is the name of the call or "HadStruc" which is how I've always spelled it? I like the latter because it makes it even more clear that we are ripping off HadSpec.

Best,
Joe

On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:01 AM Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org<mailto:sufian at jlab.org>> wrote:
Dear All,

As discussed last week, we will not have any group meeting tomorrow due to schedule conflicts and an ongoing conference where some of our collaborators are presenting their works.

Thank you.
-Raza
_______________________________________________
Hadstruct mailing list
Hadstruct at jlab.org<mailto:Hadstruct at jlab.org>
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hadstruct/attachments/20200805/b6288f1d/attachment-0001.html>