[Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Re: No group meeting tomorrow

Savvas Zafeiropoulos savvaslz at gmail.com
Thu Aug 6 09:02:15 EDT 2020


Dear All,


>>>> PS There was significant resistance to HadStruc when I suggested it, but I don't think anyone has come up with a better alternative. I'm not backing down now.

Maybe LP1 would have been better because we are the first, the best and all the other always are following our approach (eventually) but let’s stick to HadStruc for the moment :) 

Best,
Savvas


> On 6 Aug 2020, at 15:00, David Richards <dgr at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kostas et al,
> 
> Well, I’ve been using the t for no particularly good reason, but I agree that it doesn’t add anything - and indeed doesn’t run off the tongue as well….  I’ll have to change my currently very primitive slides!
> 
> David
> 
>> On Aug 5, 2020, at 6:22 PM, Konstantinos Orginos <kostas at jlab.org <mailto:kostas at jlab.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> OK I can change the orange to the official JLab red.
>> 
>> K.
>> 
>>> On Aug 5, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Robert Edwards <edwards at jlab.org <mailto:edwards at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Indeed, I recall HadSpect not having a sufficient ring in very early discussions, so HadSpec stuck. I suggest this group adopting HadStruc. Might want to setup  an alias for the mailing list.
>>> 
>>> If Chris wanted to accelerate discussions, come up with a logo. That casts everything in bits (no stone here). BTW, the hadspec logo features the “official" JLab red. Yep, that’s a thing.
>>> 
>>> Robert
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 5, 2020, at 6:06 PM, Monahan, Christopher <cjmonahan at wm.edu <mailto:cjmonahan at wm.edu>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> PS There was significant resistance to HadStruc when I suggested it, but I don't think anyone has come up with a better alternative. I'm not backing down now.
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> 
>>>> Chris Monahan
>>>> Pronouns: he/his
>>>> Assistant Professor
>>>> Department of Physics
>>>> William & Mary
>>>> From: Monahan, Christopher <cjmonahan at wm.edu <mailto:cjmonahan at wm.edu>>
>>>> Sent: 05 August 2020 18:05
>>>> To: Joseph Karpie <jmkarpie at email.wm.edu <mailto:jmkarpie at email.wm.edu>>; Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org <mailto:sufian at jlab.org>>
>>>> Cc: hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org> <hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Re: No group meeting tomorrow
>>>>  
>>>> I believe I am responsible for the "HadStruc" suggestion and I certainly intended it to be a riff on HadSpec. I would campaign for the spelling without the "t". I would also encourage everyone to use it as much as possible so it really sticks 🙂
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Chris
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> 
>>>> Chris Monahan
>>>> Pronouns: he/his
>>>> Assistant Professor
>>>> Department of Physics
>>>> William & Mary
>>>> From: Hadstruct <hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org <mailto:hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of Joseph Karpie <jmkarpie at email.wm.edu <mailto:jmkarpie at email.wm.edu>>
>>>> Sent: 05 August 2020 17:57
>>>> To: Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org <mailto:sufian at jlab.org>>
>>>> Cc: hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org> <hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org>>
>>>> Subject: [Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Re: No group meeting tomorrow
>>>>  
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>> 
>>>> Since we didn't have a meeting, I didn't have a chance to ask a very important question to the group. Since the name of our call has stuck, I am assuming we are committing to this name for our collaboration. I wanted to name our collaboration on my APLatt slides. Is anyone opposed to that happening? If not, I would encourage David and Colin to do so as well. 
>>>> 
>>>> Now the important question is, shall we call it "HadStruct" which is the name of the call or "HadStruc" which is how I've always spelled it? I like the latter because it makes it even more clear that we are ripping off HadSpec.
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Joe
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:01 AM Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org <mailto:sufian at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>>> Dear All, 
>>>> 
>>>> As discussed last week, we will not have any group meeting tomorrow due to schedule conflicts and an ongoing conference where some of our collaborators are presenting their works. 
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> -Raza
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Hadstruct mailing list
>>>> Hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:Hadstruct at jlab.org>
>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Hadstruct mailing list
>>>> Hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:Hadstruct at jlab.org>
>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Hadstruct mailing list
>>> Hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:Hadstruct at jlab.org>
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hadstruct mailing list
>> Hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:Hadstruct at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hadstruct mailing list
> Hadstruct at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hadstruct/attachments/20200806/eac64af8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Hadstruct mailing list