[Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Re: Update....

[Savvas Zafeiropoulos]

I agree with Anatoly’s observation. In the jargon of the community pseudo-PDFs is the term that everyone uses. Indeed there is the absolutely 
correct way of putting things as Raza mentioned (and we do it in the talks) but maybe we can stick to the catchy label for computer time proposals.
Best,
Savvas

> On 8 Mar 2020, at 23:29, Anatoly Radyushkin <radyush at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> We are asking for money (in the form of computer time, but still).
> 
> There is some difference, if we ask them for "pseudo-PDFs" or
> for "reduced Ioffe-time pseudodistributions".
> I am afraid that in the latter case,  we will just will get the question: "For what?"
> 
> 
> From: Hadstruct <hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Monahan, Christopher <cjmonahan at wm.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2020 9:50 AM
> To: David Richards <dgr at jlab.org>; Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org>
> Cc: hadstruct at jlab.org <hadstruct at jlab.org>
> Subject: [Hadstruct] [EXTERNAL] Re: Update....
>  
> Hi David,
> 
> No problem! I hadn't had a chance to read it yet, so I didn't even notice. I did notice that you list Joe Karpie twice, though.
> 
> Regards,
> Chris
> From: Hadstruct <hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of David Richards <dgr at jlab.org>
> Sent: 08 March 2020 09:48
> To: Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org>
> Cc: hadstruct at jlab.org <hadstruct at jlab.org>
> Subject: Re: [Hadstruct] Update....
>  
> Hi Raza,
> 
> Thank you for your very careful reading.  I will implement the changes - you are right about different naming at different points.  Probably ITD is the best name (with or without reduced) as it applies also to the LCS method.
> 
> BTW, my apologies to Chris whom I inadvertently left off, or rather didn’t realize I hadn’t added!
> 
> Regards,
> David
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2020, at 9:02 PM, Raza Sufian <sufian at jlab.org <mailto:sufian at jlab.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi David, 
>> 
>> Thank you for sending us the USQCD proposal. 
>> 
>> Attached please find a version that includes corrections to some typos and some edits for your consideration. We have separately used pseudo-PDFs, pseudodistributions, pseudo distribution, and reduced Ioffe-time pseudo distribution at different places in the draft. Can we stick to one convention, something like "reduced Ioffe-time distribution" and use reduced-ITD throughout the draft? I personally do not favor "pseudo-PDFs" because the PDFs obtained is from reduced ITD. 
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> -Raza
>> From: Hadstruct <hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org <mailto:hadstruct-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of David Richards <dgr at jlab.org <mailto:dgr at jlab.org>>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2020 9:04 AM
>> To: hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org> <hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:hadstruct at jlab.org>>
>> Subject: [Hadstruct] Update....
>>  
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> Anatoly noticed I messed up the formatting at the end of the resources section.  I attach a fixed version, but I’ve made not changes to the text.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> David
>> <RSS_usqcd2020.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> Hadstruct mailing list
>> Hadstruct at jlab.org <mailto:Hadstruct at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct>
> _______________________________________________
> Hadstruct mailing list
> Hadstruct at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hadstruct

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hadstruct/attachments/20200308/8f13cd0b/attachment-0001.html>